My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_00523
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF001 - PF999
>
500-599
>
pf_00523
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2024 2:06:39 PM
Creation date
2/14/2024 2:06:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
510
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />. � <br />October 1, 1969 <br />CAS E NO : <br />APPL{CANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />523-69 <br />Minnesota hi ighway Department <br />Snelling Avenue from County Road C to Hamiine Avenue <br />Consideration of Design Study <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />1. At previous meetings with the Planning Commission and the Highway Depart- <br />ment we have reviewed v�arious proposals for the handling of Snellir�g Avenue <br />from County Road C to Hamline Avenue. In the past, su�gestions have in- <br />cluded interchanges afi �ounty F;oad C-2 at its pr�sent al ignment, possibil ities <br />for interchange at C-2 somewhat south of its present alignment, and ofiher <br />proposais suggesting no interchange at C-2 bufi an overpass at County Road <br />C-2 or Lydia Avenue. At the fast meeting when the plans were reviewed. <br />overlays prepared by the village 'indicated various possibilities for infierchange <br />movements approximately centrai betwe�n the proposed interchanges at <br />County Ro�d C and Hamline Avenue. Following review of th�se plans,the <br />Corrtmission requested that we meet with the �iighway Department to consider ti�e <br />merits of an interchange verses the }aossibility of having only an overpass <br />between Coun�y Road C and Ham) ine Avenue. <br />2. This week your vil iage engineer and planner met with representatives of the <br />Highway Department to review these questions. it appears that fih�e development <br />of on interchange can most readily be accomplished at Lydia Avenue. However, <br />the interchan�e will,of course,be very cl�se to Hamline Avsnue to the narth. <br />With some justification, there is considerable reluctance on the part af the <br />Metropolitan Council (and the Highway Department) to construct interchanges <br />at a half mile int�rvaf as would be the case here. In the overall, the delefierious <br />e�fects of highway traffic to the residential areas involved is minimal if we <br />simply have a straight forward service road system connecting interchanges at <br />County Road C and Haml ine Avenue. This creates a difference of sl ightly over <br />a mile between ihe interchanges with a motel approximately half way beiv�eer�. <br />Considering fihe implications and problems involved in construcfing any irterchange. <br />between County Road C and Hamline, there appears considerable merit in utilizing <br />the simpler solution with merely an overpass at Lydia. The larger scale drawings <br />and overfays wii! be available at the meefiingto further discuss the merits of this <br />proposa I . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.