Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Paul Pink and associates, inc. <br />September 27, 1984 <br />Memo Re Pavilion Place <br />Page Two <br />8. Howard suggested that the upper level parking rows be oriented more <br />directly to south building entrance. <br />9. It was suggested that more landscaping be provided at both parking <br />levels to better screen automobiles. <br />10. Charles stated that the north property line fence may become an <br />important issue with the parking structure eliminated. <br />11. Paul Pink and Associates will re study entire parking area and auto <br />access. <br />12. Howard recommended that a parking variance be requested by Developer <br />if the previously discussed parking lot improvements reduce car count <br />below City Ordinance requirements. <br />13. Service doors at the east elevation would be unacceptable to the City. <br />Only Code required exit doors and exit ways will be allowed at the <br />east elevation. <br />14. Howard discouraged the proposed use of a decorative concrete masonry <br />unit. However, the issue â–ºvas left open for discussion. Burnished <br />block, exterior ceramic veneer, integral rock face block, and/or a <br />combination of the above including brick may be acceptable, however, <br />samples or examples of alternate exterior finish and decorative <br />masonry detailing should be submitted to Howard before the Planning <br />Commission and Council meetings. <br />15. Due to the extent of the revision it was determined that the Developer <br />re submit to Planning Commission and City Council for approval. Revised <br />drawings will be submitted to Ron by Wednesday, October 3, 1984 for <br />Noveiiiher Council Planning Commission meetings. The above drawings need <br />not be complete. <br />16. Dick determined that the required meeting with the neighbors should <br />occur on or before October 15, 1984. <br />IM/id <br />cc: All Present <br />Joe Weis <br />Orrin Ericson <br />Tim Reine r <br />