pf_01776 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1 July 1987 1776 Centre Pointe Investment Company Limited Partnership Between 35W and Cleveland Avenue, South of County Road D to County Road C Interchange (see sketch) Vacation of Right -of -Way and Approval of Preliminary Plat 1. The staff has reviewed and approved the comprehensive redevelopment plan for the area in question which included a Planned Unit Development, removal of all existing structures, and the development. of a new circulation system and infrastructure into the area. Implementation of this development included the completion of a development agreement relating to a significant tax .increment program which has now been consummated between the City and the Woodbridge people. The next step is the implementation of a plat preceded by the vacation of certain right-of-ways and easements, the retention of some easements, and the adoption of additional easements. 2. The documentation for this rather complicated process has been completed and carefully reviewed by the City Engineering staff. Mr. Janisch informs us that the schedule is: of easements to be vacated, easements to be retained, new easements and right-of-ways to be dedicated are all in order. Mr. Janisch will elaborate further on the details of this proposal at the Planning Commission Hearing. 3. Attached is a reduced copy of the right-of-way as it relates to the development plan and a copy of the preliminary plat proposal. 4. The action requested is: a) Approval of a preliminary plat for Centre Pointe Business Park Limited Partnership, Northwestern National Life Insurance Company, Title Insurance Company of Minnesota dated May 29, 1987, and as prepared by the Sunde Land Surveying, Inc. b) Approval of vacation of street right-of-ways as dated June 1, 1987 and on file with the City of Roseville. c) Vacation of easements as dated and on file with the .City of Roseville (this document has no date, but may be identified with a date by the Planning Commission Secretary). There is also a list of easements to be retained which would appear to require no action, though their presence may be appropriately identified.