My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01877
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1800-1899
>
pf_01877
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2024 9:57:58 AM
Creation date
2/16/2024 9:46:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1877
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL <br />�t`fp FOUNDED IN 1849 <br />August 12, 1988 <br />Mr. Steve Wilson <br />Brutger Companies, Inc. <br />One Sunwood Drive - Box 399 <br />St. Cloud, Minnesota 56302 <br />Dear Mr. Wilson: <br />Re: Concordia Academy Housing <br />St. Paul, Ramsey County <br />MHS Referral File Number: <br />Thank you for contacting this office regarding the project <br />proposed for the above -referenced property. We have reviewed the <br />property to determine whether it contains reported historical or. <br />archaeological sites listed on the National Register of Historic <br />Places or, in other inventories. No sites are reported in or in <br />the immediate vicinity of the property. <br />In the absence of reported sites, we have also evaluated the <br />likelihood that unreported historic or archaeological sites may <br />be present within the property. Although we cannot state with <br />certainty that there are no significant unreported historical or <br />archaeological sites within the property, we feel that the <br />probability of such sites being present is low. This county has <br />been surveyed for significant historical buildings and other <br />structures, and none was noted within the property limits. It is <br />also our opinion that the property does not contain the kinds of <br />shoreline and other settings in which prehistoric archaeological <br />sites are typically found. <br />Please note that this comment letter does not address the <br />requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation <br />Act of 1966 and 36CFR800, procedures of the Advisory Council on <br />Historic Preservation for the protection of historic properties. <br />If this project is considered for federal assistance, it should <br />be submitted to our office with reference to the assisting <br />federal agency. <br />If you have questions regarding this.matter, please contact Ted <br />Lofstrom at the address and telephone number on the letterhead. <br />Sincerely, <br />Dennis A. Gimmestad <br />Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer <br />DAG:dmb <br />EXHIBIT 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.