My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01877
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1800-1899
>
pf_01877
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2024 9:57:58 AM
Creation date
2/16/2024 9:46:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1877
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. The traffic volumes will affect the safety of children <br />walking to Central Park Elementary School. <br />4. The project was subject to ext%nsive neighborhood opposition. <br />5. The issue of the City purchase of the school and ten acres <br />for a Recreation Center should be separated completely from <br />the housing project. <br />6. The proposed density of development is inconsistent with the <br />surrounding neighborhood. <br />7. That the rezoning is inconsistent with the comprehensive <br />plan. <br />The Planning Commission on a unanimous vote recommended denial of <br />J. <br />the special use permit for a planned unit development and the <br />preliminary plat bused on the following: <br />1. Thy? proposal does not clearly address or resolve water <br />pressure and fire protection problems. <br />2. The traffic generated from the proje^t will adversely affect <br />traffic conditions on adjacent roads. <br />3. The traffic volumes will affect the safety of children <br />walking to Central Park Elementary School. <br />4. The project was subject to extensive neighborhood opposition. <br />5. The issue of the City purchase of the school and ten acres <br />for a Recreation Center should be separated completely from <br />the housing project. <br />6. The proposed density of development is inconsistent with the <br />surrounding neighborhood. <br />7. That the rezoning is inconsistent with the comprehensive <br />plan. <br />8. There is a lack of a completed environmental assessment <br />worksheet for the_project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.