pf_01485 pg 1-2 of 3 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: 2 May 1984 1485-84 Discus of Roseville, Inc. West of Snelling Avenue, Northerly of Oakcrest Avenue Rezoning of Land from B-1 to B-2 and R-1 to B-2 PLUNINC CONSIDERATIONS: 1. Attached is a copy of the report prepared for last month"a Planning Commission mooting, at which time the Public the next regular mooting of the Commission (2�rMaay).ing Aden tuber of neourned to ighbors testifying, at the hearing indicated chair concern for the impact of the proposed development on the traffic conditions at the intarsection of the service road and Snelling Avenge. The Planning Commission thus delayed making a recomm@ndation on the rezoning with a request "t the applicants conduct a study of traffic conditions and impact at the frontage road access point to Snelling Avenue and their property. 2. The applicants .subsequently hired the traffic consulting firm of BRW to do a traffic analysis to datormine the impact of the restaurant on the system and the intersection at Snelling Avenge. The fire of BRV has done a consid+arabla numbar of traffic anarlyses in the metropolitan area and Roseville, the cost recent being an analysis for Rosedalt Center, and a fear months prior to that a rs-analysis of thv Har Nor Hall access situation as el*tas to the proposed improv,zante of Snelling Avenue in 1953. Attaa ch granter detail by y rig a copy of the study which will be presented in hearing. epresentative# of BRW at the Planning Comission Your staff engineer and planner will comment further on the study if requested at the planning Commission hearing. 3. The study emphasizes the impact and traffic conditions during the peak hour flows (when access and egress is most difficult off Snelling Avenue. Thus the relationship between peak hour flows at the restaurant as ralated to peak hour times for other traffic movement, is of significance. The application is for the masoning of a strip of land 49 Net in width at the s-uth edge of the property from R-1 to B-2. That remainder of the land, of enur e, has bec; <�nad B_2 since the 1959 Adoption of the new zoning map and ordinance. Leaving this strip of and R-1 would obviously be inappropriate. The possibility of rezoning it to a more restrictive commercial district, such as Limited Business, would appear to be the only reasonable alternative. If this were done, the