Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING REPORT <br />DATE:, 5 September 1984 <br />CASE NUMBER: 1534-84 <br />APPLICANT: Discus of Roseville, Inc. <br />LOCATION: Northeasterly of Snelling Avenue and <br />County Road C <br />ACTION REQUESTED: Division of a Platted Lo- <br />Variance to Parking Setback <br />Special Use Permit for Site Plan <br />Approval <br />PLANNING CONSIDERMONS: <br />1. The property in question is zoned B-IB which requires the processing of a <br />special use permit for approval of n site plan for any development to <br />occur in the B-lB District. The applicant, Discus of Roseville, proposes <br />to construct a Fuddruckers Restaurant on the proposed site, which is <br />located directly south of a similarly processed and approved site. The <br />restaurant, Stuart Anderson Cattle Company, is under construction. <br />The property in question is a portion of the old Rose Drive -In Theatre <br />site. Directly to the east is NCR's Comten home office and parking ramp, <br />and to the south is a remaining parcel of land zoned B-IB but not yet <br />proposed for development. <br />2. Copies of site plans, topography, building plans, and landscaping plans <br />have been submitted and attached for your review. You will notice that <br />the configuration of the lot and the arrangement of the parking is done in <br />a manner so as to be able to continue this parking pattern coutheasterly <br />into the uncommitted land south of the site in question. Joint parking <br />easements have been established between the properties (as was the case in <br />the first development to the north) so that the three potential sites can <br />function as one in terms of parking capability. This: tend to makes more <br />efficient use of the land, and provides access and egress from one site to <br />the other without traffic having to go out into the public street. The <br />applicant is therefore applying to a variance to the parking setback <br />requirement inasmuch as the lot line will go through the parking area, <br />without the ten (10) foot setbacks on either side of the property li`ie. <br />You will recall that in the first restaurant approval, north of the site <br />in question, a common access drive was provided for. The southerly half <br />of this drive is now being utilized by the current proposal. Similarly, <br />there is proposed to be constructed a temporary drive along the <br />southeasterly side of the current lot line proposal. This area will have <br />a common easement with the property to the south. <br />3. The Fuddruckers building is almost identical to that which was previously <br />reviewed by the Planning commission and Council proposed for the polar <br />