My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01527
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01527
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2024 11:21:32 AM
Creation date
2/16/2024 11:18:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1527
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING REPORT <br />DATE: <br />CASE NUMBER: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />• <br />3 October 1984 <br />1522-84 <br />C. R. Hackworthy <br />Northeasterly of Shady Beach Avenue, <br />North of Center Street <br />Rezoning from R-1 to R-2 <br />Approval of Preliminary Plat <br />Variance to Side Yard Setback <br />1. The Planning commission at its August meeting continued the hearing on Mr. <br />Hackworthy's proposal to the October meeting so as to allow time for the <br />applicant to adjust the development plan, and work with contiguous <br />neighbors to achieve a more acceptable solution. Attached for your <br />information is a copy of August's report which outlined some of the <br />concerns relating to the development. <br />The applicant since that time has hired new design help to address <br />concerns expressed by the Planning Commission, neighbors, and staff. <br />Attached are copies of the revised plan for the site and the structures <br />proposed. <br />2. You will notice that the driveway has been extended easterly so as reduce <br />the grade which was a matter of concern expressed by us and the <br />Commission. They have explored the possibility of placing the driveway <br />other than on the north side of the property, and have concluded that any <br />other placement would be more difficult in terms of grade and would cause <br />the removal of a number of mature, desirable trees. You will notices too <br />that the proposal now consists of two duplexes rather than three as <br />previously proposed. The design of the structures has been changed so <br />that the structure is two stories from the east side, with a partially <br />exposed basement level on the west side. Technically, it appears that the <br />site will now work well, and Provide four desirable living units <br />overlooking the lake and park. <br />3. Apparently, the principal remaining problem is the fact that the <br />contiguous single family home owner to the north desires that the <br />driveway not be located south of his home. You will note, however, that <br />the grades are such that the driveway will be substantially below the <br />grade of the contiguous property, and that the applicant proposes to <br />construct a six foot fence on this grade with landscaping on the north <br />side (towards the residence) so as to mitigate the impact of the use of <br />the driveway. <br />This impact, we feel, can be better understood if members of the Planning <br />Commission and Council are able to visit the site to consider the <br />importance of the retention of the tree growth and its relationship to the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.