pf_01483 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I —2- The Roseville Comprehensive Land Use Plan has been amended to designate the eastern portion of the property at 500 West County Road B, Roseville, as high density residential and the westerly portion as park land. The entire parcel, however, is under private ownership with both portions contributing to density allowances outlined below. We request rezoning from R1 to R3A to permit the construction of up to 130 units of elderly housing in a single building. This is a reduction from the 156 proposed intitally and was determined based on R3A permited density. Parking would be built below residential units which would relate to the surface parking, entrance and principal common spaces. The residential unit levels would begin above the parking and relate to existing grade along the easterly property line and the elevation of County Road B. Common space for dining and group activities would be provided at the center -of the L shaped plan and orientate to the west. The building is envisioned to have two heights. This is a change from the earlier submission of six stories with roof dormer units and is in response to some of the concerns raised in the earlier public hearings on this subject. The entire north —south portion of the building along the easterly property line will now be three stories with some "dormer units" built into roof structure above. The east —west wing which is set Into the three story portion and extending west will be reduced to five stories of residential units with "dormer units" set back into the roof structure as well. This revision substantially increases the sideyard set back of the higher wing from the east property line which is parallel to Cohansey Boulevard. The higher wing now extends west to the drainage ditch and will receive approximately 100' of special foundations to accomodate the soft: soils. This extension will bring the corridor lengths to practical limits for elderly housing and be approximately equal distance north and west from the elevators. The height relationsiitp of the proposed building to the adjoining property to the southeast is affected by the existing gradient of the site. We are suggesting that the perceived height of the building from the southeast• is diminished by cutting the structure into the slope of the land. It appears that the first floor of units on the east will be as much as 12' below the adjoining land and possibly 15' with the final grading in place. This would translate to a level approximately three to six feet above the second floor of residential units. Landscaping or screening would be in addition to this height and would screen much of the third floor and its dormers. Eighty—two (82) enclosed parking spaces will be provided on the lower level with the capability to provide u to an additional fourt p y—eight (48) on surface should the need be justified. This would account for up to a 1:1 parking ratio or as may be deemed appropriate to this building type when documented by survey of similar projects. The average unit size is 800 sq. building including common space is circulat.ton Is 139,500 sq. ft., not ft. The net square footage of the 118,00u sq. ft. The gross area with including parking.