My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01612
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1600-1699
>
pf_01612
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2024 12:38:48 PM
Creation date
2/16/2024 12:38:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1601
Planning Files - Type
Division of Land
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:u +- i sevi e :JINNESC)TA 5511: <br />2bb0 CIVIC CENTERDRI!/+ ifLL,H(7�1r +4�d-337 o <br />To: Ron Moorse <br />From: David P. Drown, Assistant City Engineer <br />Re: Comments on Terry Huiras Preliminary Plat <br />Date: September 3, 1985 <br />I have reviewed the drawing recently submitted by Mr. Huiras for conformance <br />with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance for Preliminary Plats and <br />offer the following comments: <br />1. Document submitted is referred to as a "Preliminary Registered Land <br />Survey". Roseville ordinance clearly requires a plat in this case. <br />2. The southernmost house/lot should be included in this plat. The plat <br />should include all land forming the original Registered Land Survey <br />No. 234• <br />3. Preliminary plat drawings should show additions to public facilities. <br />Sewer and water are conceptually shown, but roadway and drainage are <br />omitted. <br />A major question here is whether the new lot labeled "A" will ultimately <br />serve one or two buildings. It is certainly large enough to form two lots. <br />If so, both public sewer and water mains must be extended to the future <br />lot line to serve the north of the lot. If not, only the sewer needs to <br />be extended. <br />In addition, the public road must be upgraded to city standards, <br />including concrete curbing and adequate turn around faoilities. We would <br />suggest, given the limited right-of-way available here that a 24 foot wide <br />roadway be constructed with no parking on either side of the street. This <br />roadway should be extended north of the subdivision onto city property <br />where a standard 100 foot diameter oul de sac should be built. Catch <br />basins and outlet piping from this eul de sac will also be necessary. <br />The subdivider has the option of either constructing all of these public <br />facilities at his cost or to petition the City to construct them as an <br />assessment project. The former option requires a deposit of one and one- <br />half the estimated cost of improvements. <br />4. An additional seven feet of right-of-way along the northern part of the <br />subdivision and three feet of right-of-way along the southern part of the <br />subdivision should be dedicated. This will allow approximately 40 feet <br />of right-of-way east of the existing MnDot ohainlink fence and allow for <br />street construction and snow storage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.