My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01599
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01599
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2024 2:35:01 PM
Creation date
2/16/2024 2:34:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1590
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING REPORT <br />DATE: <br />CASE NUMBER: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />5 June 1985 <br />1599-85 <br />Northwestern District of <br />the Christian and Missionary <br />Alliance Church <br />Northwest Corner of Garden <br />Avenue and Lexington Avenue <br />Rezoning from R-1 to B-1 <br />Variance to Parking Spaces <br />1. Attached is a copy of our report written for the 1 May <br />meeting of the Planning Commission at which time the property <br />in question was considered for amendment to the Comprehensive <br />Plan from Low Density Residential to Limited Business land <br />use. The City Council approved the amendment to the <br />Comprehensive Plan as requested. <br />2. At this stage, the application is for rezoning of the <br />property from R-1 to B-1 and a request for a variance to the <br />number, of parking spaces required for the proposed offi-I <br />building. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan sets the <br />Policy that the property may now be appropriate zoned for <br />Limited Business use. Thus, at this point, the question is <br />one of handling the use appropriately on the land and <br />consideration of the variance. <br />3. The applicants have met with three of the contiguous <br />neighbors to get their input regarding appropriate required <br />screening where the business property will be contiguous to a <br />residential zo.ie. Attached is a copy of a letter dated 21 <br />May 1985 to the Planning Commission indicating the results of <br />these meetings with the property owners. <br />The landscaping plan has been adjusted to reflect the <br />conditions desired by the contiguous neighbors. We would <br />suggest that the Planning Commission in considering approval <br />make the landscape plan subject to staff review. We suggest <br />that additional landscaping may be appropriate, particularly <br />on the north side of the building. <br />Though the fence is located at the northwest corner of the <br />site, the details of the fence have not been determined. We <br />suggest that within the context of the neighbors desires, <br />that an appropriate solution can be readily accomplished. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.