pf_01576 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CASE NUMBER: 1576-85 APPLICANT: Metropolitan Recovery Corporation Page 2 3. So as to aid the Planning Commission and Council in their review of the development proposal, we have requested from the applicant that a summary of the development be prepared relating specifically to the list of functions to be considered in an application for the Special Use Permit as designated in the new zoning district and the special use therein. A copy of that summary is attached entitled Metropolitan Central Treatment and Recovery Facility, Executive Summary of Rezoning Application, dated 22 February 1985. This should aid in the consideration of any specific conditions to be attached relating to the functions outlined in the Ordinance. Yt should be borne in mind that the principal control agency for the facility's approval and operation is the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (PCA). Thus, a general condition attached to the approval of the Special Use Permit should include: a. Facilities construction and operation shall be in accordance with regulations and approvals of the State of Minnesota PCA.. b. The development and application, drawings, da operation shall be in and data as submitted accordance with the by the applicant and, c. Any additional specific conditions relating to the list of functional criteria listed in the special use text of the Zoning Ordinance considered necessary beyond those committed in the application. 4. With respect to the Preliminary Plat, a reduced copy which is attached. The proposal is to develop the total tract into two lots, one with 4.52 acres (Lot 1) and the easterly lot with 3.62 acres (Lot 2). Lot 1 is to be occupied buy the Waste Recovery Facility, and the remaining lot will be utilized for other development. Engineering staff comments on the proposed Preliminary Plat are as follows: 1. Drainage plans submitted are incomplete although conceptually workable. We suggest any planning action be contingent on staff approval of drainage and grading. 2. Newly created Lot Number 2 to the east will not have access to a public sewer. Thus, it appears the existing sanitary sewer in Rose Place should be extended to the east to serve this new lot. The City codes require the developer to deposit one and one-half times the estimated cost of this work, or to petition the City to construct it and assess it as a public improvement. 3. Driveway width is excessive on Rose Place. Ordinance limits driveway width to a maximum of thirty (30) feet plus ten (10) foot radii.