Laserfiche WebLink
Analysis of Costco Proposal <br />June 16, 1986 <br />t Page 5 <br />taxes. This would leave approximately $142,000 in potential tax increment <br />revenue that could be applied towards the project. <br />This project has some obvious uses for tax increment financing, such as land <br />acquisition and site clearance. PFS has not undertaken an analysis of the <br />financial feasibility of tax increment financing nor an evaluation of the need <br />for tax increment financing or any other type of public support. In eval- <br />uating the need for tax increment financing, the City should take into <br />consideration the following: <br />• Need: Hoke much, if any, public support is needed to make the <br />project financially feasible? The developer should be required to <br />supply the City with detailed financial projections indicating the <br />impact of any public support on the feasibility of the project. <br />• Tax R2-form: How does proposed federal tax reform legislation affect <br />the project? It is likely that tax reform, if enacted, will in some <br />manner hinder the City's use of tax exempt financing to facilitate <br />this project. If adopted in a form similar to the House Plan (H.R. <br />3838), tax reform could eliminate the use of tax exempt financing <br />for many aspects of this project (i.e. - land acquisition, demoli- <br />tion, clearance). The joint statement issued by leaders in Congress <br />has created a "window" in the tax reform process. The City would be <br />able to issue bonds under 1985 rules if the bond issue can be closed <br />by September Ist. With each passing day it will become more <br />difficult to meet this deadline. It is possible that the final form <br />of tax reform could contain a 1987 effective date, but this should <br />not be relied on to any great extent. In this light, the City may <br />wish to consider the use of taxable bonds or a pay-as-you-go <br />approach to any City financed activities. <br />u Fiscal Disparities: How would any use of 'tax increment financing on <br />the project be treated from the perspective of fiscal disparities? <br />There has been a growing concern on the part of the City on the <br />impact of tax increment financing and fiscal disparities. If tax <br />increment financing projects capture all of the available tax <br />increment revenue, then the general tax base must make up the <br />required contribution. If the tax increment district make the <br />contribution, then only a portion of the projected tax increment <br />revenue would be available. <br />Summary <br />Although final results of the land use, financial and market study of the <br />target areas are not available at this time, enough information is available <br />for the City to evaluate the Costco proposal. Based on the analysis of the <br />Costco proposal conducted by the project team, the following recommendations <br />are hereby offered: <br />(1) From a market viewpoint, there are no apparent reasons to oppose Costco's <br />proposal to locate on the County Road C site. The store will be a higher <br />and better use than now existing. It could be the first facility in a <br />new commercial concentration. <br />