My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01916
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1900-1999
>
pf_01916
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2025 11:04:40 AM
Creation date
2/16/2024 4:00:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1916
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Page# 4 <br />Wednesday, February 1, 1989 <br />Will comply with ordinance,ant9slacesnts butand <br />nonethat <br />for t e center as <br />public restrooms in the to p <br />a whole. <br />Goedeke stated his concern Goedeke thelarge <br />aexpressed signsshown <br />about <br />the Chiles Restaurant. <br />having other restaurants on the site. <br />Johnson asked if there would be neon on the pylon signs. gown <br />answered that there would be some thin line neon on the cap of <br />the pylon signs. <br />Stokes expressed concern about the width and amount of stacking <br />available at the southeast entrance. gown replied that the <br />entrance would taper from, Fairview and would be 15 feet at its <br />narrowest dimension. <br />wou dBrown <br />pointed <br />stacking that <br />way entrance which providefor approximately ten <br />cars. <br />Stokes stated that he had concerns about the amount of stacking <br />availabla, especially at Christmas tima and askOd if tho <br />developers had any foodhack from. Cantor Companios. Brown statedthat Center Companies are working on gaining approval from their <br />tonal - ors the relocation of than driveway but have no commitmant <br />at this point in time. Brown zummarized why stacking should not <br />be a problom including the one way nature of tho road and the <br />signal timit'g. <br />Stokes guostioned 010 tenatat signage locations and color. Brown <br />summarized the location size and danign of the tonant and anchor <br />tenant nignacle. Bro;gin added that each tenant had its own colors <br />but that they hays to i=p approved by the owner. <br />@ oollor }� .ad fog` �lr rificatior, on the re,,ItaBrant traah <br />oncl enure. f o°..*n t.o .t i o i d that t� .rncio Bur would bo brick <br />walla 6 to a feet high. <br />Barry raked for cl ar i f ie4t loft of traysh eij c for-urovi on the shopping <br />center huild ng, 1�:°own �. s riwayl teat ana;lo kire designs. <br />Barr, guef=M honed col- ° Of the, Overhead duos v - Drown At4tcd that <br />a color would bQ 010,On to c 4ko ttlo doors blond into the <br />building, <br />Berry a ke assent ;�t 4 t l d caping would be pros.}ids along tha+. <br />south end. orown s t.it.cd that there would he a 5 foot wido nodded <br />area. <br />Perry <br />Perri <br />ah i,�{x,*r.3wtp�,�it*: <br />cti r:S e�°�yr�ce <br />would there be in the <br />CtiOdrenn <br />`loyaf R <br />p4l.,jco <br />Ki.dA <br />store <br />and <br />at, <br />#! � e <br />i!1rof ��r: .i���l <br />the <br />existing <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.