My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01976
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1900-1999
>
pf_01976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2024 9:05:39 AM
Creation date
2/20/2024 8:58:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1404
Planning Files - Type
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M E M O R A N D U M <br />DATE: June 29, 1989 <br />TO. Planning Commission Members <br />FROM: Craig A. Waldron <br />SUBJECT: Financing for the Post Office <br />With respect to the proposed Post Office, I have been working <br />of <br />coun <br />the f .nancing package that could be reviewed by the City <br />if the Planning Commission should deem the modified proposal to <br />be acceptable. <br />If th <br />e Council should determine that tax increment financing is <br />feasible, the proposal could be structured as follows: <br />1. The City can use tax increment for land write down purposes <br />enses incurred by the developer. <br />to offset additional exp is $298,400 according to Ramsey <br />The current land value <br />County. <br />Roseville Properties had originally hoped for $200,000 to <br />2. art of the building and <br />facilitate the removal of the front p <br />It is my <br />construct the additional 000t wouldsie be improvements. morappropriate. <br />recommendation that $ year offset for lost rent for <br />This figure is based on a two y <br />the 12, 000 sq. feet plus the actual The developer ost Of the demolition <br />be <br />of the front part of the building. <br />losing $325,000 in building value and future tents. <br />Roseville Properties has also stated <br />000a to $150,000the Site <br />improvement costs are in the range of $ aid down by <br />The existing mortgage will also have to be p <br />Rosev 41le Properties in order that �atchc�s the actualthe new asset loan <br />(without the front of the building) <br />amount. <br />completely contingent on a <br />Again, �this potential financing is <br />building that is acceptable to the Planning Commission And City' <br />Council. At that point in time, <br />the City Council would haVe to <br />Council. whether it would want to utilize tax increment for the <br />purposes of the most Office. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.