Laserfiche WebLink
Michael Strub, Case No. 2050 <br />Engineering Considerations <br />Page 2 <br />The Engineering Department notes that the water service for the <br />existing house is located on the new lot proposed to the north. An <br />easement would have to be given if the existing service is to remain <br />intact. There is no sanitary sewer or water services built to the new <br />lot. That is to say, new house lines would have to be constructed to <br />provide services to the lot. <br />Policy Considerations <br />It has been the policy <br />of the City <br />of Roseville to improve the division <br />of land creating lots <br />that may be <br />less than the normal development <br />standard if they are <br />reasonably <br />in scale with the lots in the <br />neighborhood. Thus, it <br />would appear <br />that this condition is satisfactory. <br />The land to the south <br />and west is <br />developed for business. Contiguous <br />lots to the north and <br />east were part of the original plat and originally <br />developed at 50 feet. <br />As noted, most of these homes are developed on <br />one and one-half lots. <br />City policy <br />requires that a house constructed on zz <br />the new lot would require a 10-foot <br />side yard setback on both sides. <br />4. CONCLUSION <br />It would appear that <br />the property <br />in question is reasonably in scale <br />with the neighborhood. <br />A positive <br />consideration on the proposal could <br />include a condition that: <br />Appropriate easements should <br />be granted for the existing water <br />service, or that <br />the service <br />be replaced so that each lot will <br />have separate sewer and water <br />services directly to the public <br />right-of-way. <br />