Laserfiche WebLink
Fine Associates, Case No. 1774 Page 2 <br />land uses, parking, access, and landscaping. Division of the land is <br />proposed to follow at a later date (approximately a month later) as an <br />element of timing relating to the tax increment ingredient of the <br />overall project. <br />4. The Residence Inn proposal consisting of thirteen 8 unit structures plus <br />the headquarters building. This development will augment to other Inns <br />in the Metropolitan Area; one in Eden Prairie and one in Eagan. The <br />Eden Prairie Residence Inn has enjoyed the highest occupancy rate of <br />any motel or hotel in the Metropolitan Area. Its market is <br />substantially different from the typical hotel in that they are usually <br />occupied by persons with more extended stays and include cooking and <br />eating facilities. They are built in clusters and appear more like <br />residence townhouses rather than motel rooms. <br />5. The two office buildings are located near the immediate intersection of <br />County Road C so as to enhance the image of that intersection. <br />Access to the structures are provided by a pair of driveways orienting <br />to the frontage road. Thus, in the entire development there is no <br />direct access to either County Road C or Snelling Avenue. <br />6. The variance requested is for the amount of parking relating to the <br />proposed furniture store at the far .northwest corner of the site. Such <br />stores tend to be relatively large in area, but low in consumer traffic <br />and parking need. With purchases normally being "large ticket items" <br />the need for parking capacity similar to other - retail stores is <br />significantly less. Therefore, the proposal is to provide parking at a <br />rate of three spaces per 1,000 square feet gross rather than the five <br />spaces required in typical retail establishments. The parking ratio is <br />similar to that of the Dayton's Home Store located at the southwest <br />corner of Hamline and Highway 36. Here again, the parking provided <br />has been found to be ample. <br />7. In our meetings with the developers and their representatives, the staff <br />stressed the importance of the high level of aesthetic quality. <br />Fortunately, in this case a single developer and architectural firm <br />controls the design element. Several perspectives have been prepared <br />indicating the nature of this result. Additional details regarding the <br />aesthetics may be discussed at the Planning Commission and Council <br />hearings. <br />8. The Engineering Staff notes that the drainage concept appears workable, <br />though there may be some adjustments in actual pond size and capacity <br />as a part of the more detailed engineering considerations. Some <br />changes in utility easements will be necessitated and controlled by the <br />land division to be processed later. The overall traffic considerations <br />and engineering concepts are workable. We have, however, discussed the <br />possibility of one minor adjustment in the driveway location, that being <br />the second driveway from the southeast, to be relocated slightly further <br />to the northwest in order to align up with the northerly most access to <br />the Comten Development. This might result in the slight modification <br />of the ponding area and the parking layout contiguous to the northwest. <br />