Laserfiche WebLink
Merila and Associates <br />STS Project 93492 <br />December 19, 1984 -11- <br />Retaining Wall Design <br />The retaining wall supporting the north drive adjacent to the proposed <br />counterfort wall. The <br />structure <br />should be designed as a cantilever or <br />base of th <br />is wall could be considered a shallow foundation, subject to <br />ined load. The foundation must be large enough to <br />an eccentrically incl <br />reduce the bearing stress to within the limits of the bearing capacity <br />of the underlying soil, resist sliding along the foundation base and <br />resist overturning or rotation around the toe of the wall. The retain- <br />- in`9 wall foundation should be based at least 4 ft below the proposed <br />e side to prevent frost penetration. Based <br />final grade on the down -slop <br />_ on the borings performed closest to the location of this proposed <br />retaining wall, there is to be.an excavation of unsuitable subbase <br />soils which could result in the retaining wall being placed primarily <br />on structural fill. Structural fill used beneath this retaining wall <br />foundation should be placed and compacted in a manner similar to that <br />for building foundations as discussed previously. <br />The retaining wall should be provided with a drain tile system and with <br />weep holes through the wall to allow drainage of the backfill material <br />in order to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressures. Granular <br />soil should be used behind retaining walls and should be placed on a <br />suitable non -organic subbase soil in lifts not to exceed approximately <br />9 inches in loose thickness and be compacted to within 95% of the <br />maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor method. <br />