Laserfiche WebLink
I . , <br />PASTER ENTERPRISES, CASE 1664 <br />Page 2 <br />4. The proposed shopping center conforms to all requirements except <br />that <br />the dedication of an additional 16.5 feet of right-of-way on the <br />west <br />side of Lexington Avenue pushes the parking back to the extent <br />that <br />the Center would be undevelopable as a shopping center. The staff <br />has <br />reviewed this problem with the applicants and has suggested that <br />they <br />apply for a variance so as to not have a setback of the new parking <br />lot curb to the expanded right-of-way line. This is the same solution <br />that was evolved with the shopping center to the south when the <br />new <br />Texaco Station was constructed. The solution evolved at that time <br />was <br />for the developer to dedicate 16.5 feet of right-of-way for which <br />the <br />City reduced the parking setback from 15 feet to U feet. <br />5. The dedication of a 16.5 strip of property zoned B-2 in a location <br />such <br />as this is of considerable monetary consideration. If the parking <br />area <br />were to be setback an additional 15 feet, as would normally <br />be <br />required, the shallow depth of the property makes it extremely difficult <br />to develop a good shopping center. <br />6. You will <br />notice <br />in this case by examining the site plan, <br />that the <br />architect <br />has undulated thor front facade of the sups, creating <br />a rather <br />uniquely <br />covered <br />environment at the shop frontage; All this <br />could be <br />reduced, <br />allowing <br />for additional setback for the parking area, <br />but the <br />change off would <br />likely be aasthetically deleterious. <br />7. Attached is a copy of a greatly reduced landscape plan and sections of <br />the proposed structure. The landscape plan Indicates as fence on <br />the <br />worst side nand the required 10 feet of land between the parking <br />area <br />and the west line of the property. This is contiguous to the <br />recer <br />property lines of single-family residences fronting on Lindy Avenue. <br />The <br />detail Indicating the proposed construction of the fence hags not <br />been <br />provided. We suggest that tills decision relate to the desires of <br />tine <br />contiguous effected neighbor and may wait for consultation and <br />later <br />staff review. We do suggest this[ tlae landscape plain include <br />sonic <br />overstory trees in this 1U foot strip to soften the west elevation of tiles <br />structure itself. <br />b. Attached is a letter from Mr. Ld Disaster, dated .January 110 generally <br />outlining his proposal. The letter speaks of a proposed vacation of 3U <br />feet of right -of -waxy for Ulonne Street. Actual fact Is that this is all <br />easement that does not require vaac ration, but merely an adjustment <br />through staff review to make provision for utilities. Also attached in a <br />letter from Wayne Bellate, President of the 01, Mexico Restaurant. Thug <br />letter points out file approval of the oetablishment of the 25 parking <br />still& on the worst side with the addition of 46 stalls in the redesign of <br />thou parking areas on the east side. <br />9. The request than is for a variance to the front yard setback requirod <br />for parking contiguous to as public right-of-wny from 15 tout to u. The <br />Planning CoifiltiliSSiOri and Council may wish to consider a condition to <br />this variance that the site be developed in accordance with the plans tin <br />submitted with the variance application and that 16.5 foot of <br />right-of-way be dedicated contiguous to Lexington Avenue. Another <br />condition might Include final staff review of engineering and lond:icaaping <br />details. <br />