Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />Page Six <br />April, 10, 1989 <br />Howard Dahlgren inquired how best to resolve thmpo}from Fairview Atvenueween �hDave Koski ki <br />e City and <br />County regarding access into the Tanurb Develop <br />replied that the County's objections to the Tanurb Development entry from Fairview <br />Avenue (opposite the relocated Rosedale entry) was based on an old development scheme <br />which had greater impact on that intersection then the current plan. Karl Keel explained <br />that the proposed access into the Tanurb site is primarily an entry with only service <br />vehicles permitted to exit there. Karl also stated that the left turning stacking distances <br />along Fairview Avenue were very close to having adequate space. Dave Koski <br />recommended that the City of Roseville make their desire known to the County about that <br />intersection; that if the City really wants the intersection there, that the County will have a <br />difficult time denying them. <br />Karl Keel mentioned that he was not convinced that the Fairview Avenue entry would not <br />still be a 'bottle neck caused from traffic backing up from the perimeter ring road. Dave <br />Koski responded that several options were tested regarding that problem, but that <br />widening the road into Rosedale by 2 additional lanes with a dedicated right turn lane <br />seemed to be the best solution. George Bestrum added that the outer ring road at Fairview <br />Avenue would be essentially a 4-lane road <br />Howard Dahlgren asked when west bound T.H. 36 traffic from Fairview Avenue would be <br />able to access that highway from that west <br />�ha�al Was i i he Couns 20-yearf Fairview Avenue rather which han having to <br />cross to the cast side. Karl Keel rep <br />included the upgrade of the 1' H. 36/Interstate 35 interchange. <br />Flick jnrkr asked if R1msc•v County had sc•c•n th<•rt but he wouldrgetffia copy,in their hands. <br />said that the County has not been given a copy y <br />Dave also stated that the issue regarding the Tanurb site access may not be resolved by the <br />time the Council is presented with this information. In the mean time, all plans should <br />show the Fairview Avenue intersection as a common intersection with the Tanurb <br />Development. <br />h, Doug McChane asked what format would id behelpful helpful fupresenting <br />s ,rang with mounted to the boards, <br />Howard Dahigren replied that slides very p <br />Doug asked if having a sketch or two of interior images woulu be helpful. Howard stated <br />is concerned that the pro)ed rnects <br />that that would be he fine, but not necessary. �l�cityth government's conc m-1 a further <br />code and works. 11le interior aesthetic is not really <br />sated that the Council would be most Concerned about traffic and what happens with the <br />mass transit. <br />10. George Botrurn asktci wh.it dint• thie meeting `4�u1ic 1ci nottiE„himdtc rcjntfiyas rnt tin ` onto tiult <br />IN,, nuc•ting usually st;irts at 5.00, but tileCity ?� <br />11je mkVting way: icdjournc•ci fit 11:10 a.m.. <br />'11ic� (orcgf�inh; convey our unci��r andin}, c�i itci tanii n�� tai�rc correct und init t notict' 10 tile <br />rinh, the• <br />illeeting of April 5, 1989, we acsumt our uncit rn h, <br />contrary is briJught to Oul ottention. <br />