pf_01922 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

To: Craig Waldron, Community Development Dire,tor From: Douglas Strong, Engineering Supervisor if/ Re: AMERICAN STREET Date: January 12, 1990 I have reviewed the documents sent to our office by Michael Daugherty regarding easements across Lot 1, Block 2, Rosedale Center First Edition. The following is a list of the findings of those documents: 1. Document W-75-16 #3, as indicated in green on the attached map, is a utility easement in favor of the City of Roseville. This easement should be retained insofar as the city presently has a 12" watermain line within this easement. 2. Document 84-7-1, as indicated in red on the attached map, is for a 30' public road easement in favor of the City of Roseville. This easement could be released/vacated if desired. 3. Document 84-7-21 pathway easement as indicated in orange on the attached map in favor of the City of Roseville. This pathway easement could be released/vacated as desired. 4. Document 630405F modification to easement as indicated in blue on the attached map in favor of First Federal Savings and Loan Association. This document does not affect the City of Roseville and, therefore, needs no action. 5. Document 612508, roadway easement in favor of First Federal Savings and Loan as indicated in blue on the attached map. This easement does not affect the City of Roseville and, therefore, no action is needed. It would appear that Mr. Daugherty has inadvertently left off one or two easements affecting this property when comparing the documents with the Ramsey County section map. The section map indicates an east/west road easement and a north/south utility easement which no documents were supplied for review. It is my opinion that the county would not indicate roadway easements on the section map if documents had not been recorded to indicate such easements.