Laserfiche WebLink
I r-13 7 <br />1. plaintiff was not given notice that this matter would be addressed <br />at the August 10 Council meeting; enda, but was simply <br />ter was not properly scheduled on the ag <br />2� The mat her counsel <br />addressed at the Council <br />meeting,.so that even had Plaintiff or <br />that the matter was <br />contacted the City of <br />Roseville, they would hay, been told <br />heard at the August 10 Council meeting; <br />not scheduled to be was indicated to the City <br />Council <br />3. That Plaintiff believes nothing building inspector of <br />orney for the City of Roseville or the <br />Property, although both parties <br />by either the att <br />-plaintiff's claim of ownership of the occupied <br />were aware of Plaintiff's interest; set back from the northeasterly <br />4. That the City Council approved a <br />Defendants yJood, without knowledge <br />of Lot 18, as claimed ed to be owned by <br />lot line. property; <br />� claim of ownership to a portion of that <br />of plaintiff's set back approved by the City Council <br />5. That the six (6) foot <br />of Plaintiff's row of trees; and if <br />measures to the southwesterly edge <br />excavation takes place, Plaintiff believes it will destroy her trees and <br />home; and if the home is constructed <br />significantly depreciate the value of her t <br />called he City, it <br />Wood and as approved by <br />d for in the plans submitted by <br />as back from what Plaintiff believes to be <br />will be tantamount to a zero foot set <br />er southwesterly property line; and <br />h Defendants Wood indicated twelve (12) <br />6. That the plans submitted by De line of Lot 19, <br />between the house and the northeasterly <br />to fourteen (14) feet be to shift the location of <br />re is ample room far Defendants Wood <br />indicating that the be her southwesterly <br />the house southwesterly, <br />away from what Plaintiff claims to <br />property line. <br />-5- <br />