My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01912
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1900-1999
>
pf_01912
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2024 4:49:18 PM
Creation date
2/20/2024 4:37:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1912
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Page#10 <br />Wednesday, January 4, 1989 <br />Goedeke stated that there were errors made at Loehmann's Plaza, <br />that there was parking congestion and that TGI Fridays location <br />was a mistake. Goedeke stated that it was important that the <br />City not make a similar mistake on this site. <br />Johnson informed the Commission that because of experience with <br />traffic in the area that it is important that the access to the <br />site work well. Johnson commented that the space at the <br />southeast entrance to the site is limited and maybe the building <br />size should be reduced in that area. <br />Alan Brown stated that he was aware of the concern but that their <br />traffic consultant has advised them that the design should work. <br />Brown said that the signalized intersection is not a given yet <br />but that the center would still go if it was not installed. <br />Brown stated that he was confident that the proposed design would <br />work well physically and aesthetically. <br />A representative from Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch, the traffic <br />consultant for the project, summarized their findings and pointed <br />out that the design should work as proposed. <br />DeBenedet questioned whether a stop sign would be provided where <br />the entrance drive at the southeast corner of the site meets the <br />main driving aisle on the north side of the building. The <br />traffic consultant responded that there were reasons for <br />requiring the stop sign and reasons not to have it. Dahlberg <br />pointed out that the most current drawing shows a three way stop <br />at that location. <br />The traffic consultant stated that they should review what impact <br />the stop sign might have on Fairview Avenue. <br />DeBenedet questioned how much stacking space would be provided <br />in the entrance drive. The traffic consultant replied that there <br />would be stacking for 8-10 vehicles. <br />Goedeke asked about the shops on the east end of the building. <br />Dahlberg responded that there would be 2400 sq. feet of small <br />convenience shops. <br />Goedeke stated his concern that it didn't look like a safe <br />condition. Dahlberg replied that he was confident that it would <br />work well. The traffic consultant added that he was more <br />concerned about people crossing the main road in front of the <br />stores at the entrance drive. <br />Stokes stated the need tc insure that fire concerns are <br />addressed, sidewalks are provided and that the building be brick <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.