My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01912
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1900-1999
>
pf_01912
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2024 4:49:18 PM
Creation date
2/20/2024 4:37:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1912
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Page# 9 <br />Wednesday, January 4, 1989 <br />needs, the site plan drainage and landscaping. Dahlgren stated <br />his concern about the narrow space being provided between the <br />building and the entrance at the southeast corner of the site as <br />well as concerns about the parking orientation. <br />Keel summarized drainage concerns. <br />Jim Dahlberg, KKE Architects, summarized the proposed project. <br />Johnson inquired about the pylon sign design. Dahlberg pointed <br />out that there would be two signs on Fairview which would contain <br />the names of the anchor tenants at the center. <br />Johnson inquired about the amount of parking being provided on <br />the site. Dahlgren summarized the parking calculation pointing <br />out that in his view, the parking is adequate as proposed but <br />there could be problems at peak times of the year and if usage in <br />the center changes in the future. <br />Johnson pointed out the concern that a restaurant is <br />successful, there could parking problems in the center. Dahlberg <br />responded that there would be a problem only at peak times of the <br />year. <br />Johnson inquired if the signs on the building would be a uniform <br />color. Alan Brown from Tanurb stated that the signage would be <br />similar to that at Loehmann°s Plaza and there would not be <br />uniform :in color. <br />Maschka asked what the color of the metal roof would be. <br />Dahlberg responded that it would be of green tones. <br />Moeller asked what the height of the parapet wall. would be and <br />stated his concern that the roof top units may be visible from <br />the north. Dahlberg responded that the roof units would be <br />screened and would be located toward the south of the building so <br />there should not be visible from the north <br />Moeller asked what the design of the trash enclosures was. <br />Dahlberg responded that they would be enclosed but not roofed. <br />Moeller stated his opinion that because the back of the building <br />would be visible from surrounding uses that the trash should be <br />stored totally inside. <br />Johnson informed the Commission that she had recently observed <br />the trash enclosures at Loehmann°s being wide open and that she <br />would not support a similar situation on this site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.