My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01912
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1900-1999
>
pf_01912
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2024 4:49:18 PM
Creation date
2/20/2024 4:37:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1912
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
can cause <br />California <br />supra, 643, <br />This point has some arguable merit in the sense <br />that the apartment builder, by increasing <br />population of an area, may d to the need for <br />ad <br />nt <br />public recreational facilities t theheapa tmentteis <br />as the subdivider. However, <br />n is <br />generally vertical, while the reasonably have <br />horizontal. The Legislature could <br />asr;umed that an apartment house is thus <br />smrdi ari n i <br />constructed upon land considerably <br />,Llimension than most subdivisions a� theaeingtthe <br />ion <br />of the apartment is, therefore, no <br />limited supply of open space to the same extent as <br />the formation of a subdivisionivelhi significant <br />ign fic nt <br />distinction justifies legislatively <br />g the <br />builder of an apartment housewho <br />oesofnott <br />subdivide differently than thecreator <br />subdivision. <br />The provisions of the 14 th Amendment do ntrequire <br />Reasonable <br />that every law must affect every person equally <br />classifications can be established, and it is only necessary <br />that the laws apply equally to the persons within such <br />the <br />classification. without evidence to the contrary► <br />legislative determination of the propriety of the <br />classification controls. finless thcfdistinction <br />arbitrary or fails to rest upon any substantial <br />or Apparent natural reason, such determination dill be <br />uphelpdi. er <br />See Old 1Dearb�orn�►ist butin - <br />Corporation, 295 , lg <br />As recently stated by the California Supreme Cout <br />in Grp. �e+telo went Co. V. the Cit f sty ad►cal. 3d <br />comprehensive <br />(Augus "'mere i u held � �T� he vast <br />_o" n inium conversion ordinance was p o <br />majority i t of cities and counties in +Caal i faria Exceptave dw�ere <br />c j y <br />comprehensive schemes of landinfringed <br />(ring regulation. pon fundamental <br />such regu l at i ores have <br />constitutional rights or relied on suspectcinstheifaceoof <br />ns <br />such as race, they have generally been upheld <br />due process and equal protection challenges.* <br />VII. OPPORTUNITIES FOR DEDICATIONS <br />A. In Seneral. <br />The entire land use approval process contains many <br />opportunities for cities to attach conditions for <br />of pdedication <br />of land or payments of fees as a condition of a <br />just as great a burden on the community. <br />The <br />State Supreme Court, in Associated Home Builders, <br />answered that argument as follows: <br />..14- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.