Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
I <br />Chris Seigle <br />October 27, 1988 <br />Page 5 <br />SITE ACCESS <br />Lexington Avenue and <br />to be <br />pro site plan shows access driveways along <br />is considered Thep <br />Grandview Avenue. The construction of two ac <br />ither of the <br />advantageous, g <br />iven the type of development proposed. If reconstruction)arthe <br />veways were blocked (for example because of an accident o <br />other driveway would be available. <br />Grandview has the disadvantage that it would ttend to <br />could <br />The access driveway to It is estimated that <br />increase traffic along a residentialontrGrandview west of the project site, if <br />increase by as much as 20 percent along <br />to <br />no restrictions were placed on the use of the pro <br />ject driaewaoximatelyd400w• <br />Currently, it is estimated that Grandview Avenue <br />10 percent f the project's traf- <br />vehicles per day. It is estimated p <br />vehicles per day) would use the Grandview access if free access were <br />fic (77 Grandview and Lexington driveways. This would be an <br />allowed to both the G traffic. The use of Grandview <br />Pp <br />a roximate increase of 20 percent over i <br />to access the project would be expectedxitraffic. <br />primarily during the afternoon <br />Bradford School, Inc. has indicated that restctions would <br />Grandview. <br />peak periods. B in order to minimize traffic increasesg <br />placed on this driveway <br />project will preclude the possibility of extending <br />The construction of the p 3 This roadway extension is not <br />Lovell Avenue west to Lexington Avenue. <br />e area. Therefore this is not <br />sidered necessary to serve traffic impact analysis of the project <br />• <br />considered to be an issue in the traffic <br />c ip h <br />ERJjkf <br />