Laserfiche WebLink
Bradford Schools, Inc., Case No. 1909 <br />Page 2 <br />3. With respect to access conditions as they relate to emergency vehicles, <br />we are informed by the Fire Marshal, John Nisja, that he approved of <br />the proposed turn -around facility at the southeast corner of the <br />townhouse development. However, we suggest that no access be <br />provided to Grandview based on the first stage of construction. Such <br />access should only be provided upon completion of the development in <br />its final form. <br />4. We have encore, aged the <br />traffic consultants <br />to provide background <br />data <br />as to the origin of the <br />trips anticipated to <br />and from the school. <br />For <br />this purpose, they have <br />added a map to <br />their report that shows <br />the <br />location of the students <br />attending the facility <br />now located on 117 <br />West <br />County Road B. You <br />will note that more <br />students come from <br />the <br />Roseville area than any <br />other area and <br />that the facility seems to <br />service primarily the northeast metropolitan <br />suburban area. <br />5. With respect to parking, 85 parking spaces are proposed for the 24 <br />townhouse units to be occupied by the students. Bradford Schools note <br />that this is the right amount of parking based on their experience of <br />running such schools in other parts of the country (and Roseville). <br />6. It is interesting to note that the eight unrelated students occupying a <br />sir~:rle townhouse unit constitutes two families as defined in the <br />Roseville Zoning Code. A family is defined as "one or more persons <br />each related to the other by blood, marriage, or adoption, or a group <br />of not more than four persons (nr` related) together with their domestic <br />servant, or gratuitous guests, maintaining a common household and using <br />common, cooking and kitchen facilities." Thus, the eight students <br />constitute a theoretical family of two. If we are providing two parking <br />spaces per family unit, the number of families would constitute 40 in <br />24 townhouse units, and the number of parking spaces theoretically <br />required would consequently require 96. Therefore, the 85 spaces <br />proposed are within the requirement. This is, of course, all theory. <br />What really counts is the automobile possession and parking policies <br />established by the school for its students. <br />7. Attached with this submission jA <br />a new <br />plan indicating the way in <br />which <br />the additional garages would be <br />added <br />to the townhouse: complex <br />in the '- <br />event that they are disassuciated <br />with <br />the ;school. The: new -plan <br />shows <br />40 garages providing 48 parking <br />spacers. <br />The Ordinance requires <br />that <br />there should be one garage <br />space <br />per each unit. Linder <br />these <br />circumstances there should be total parking accommodation, exclusive of <br />the space in front of a garage, <br />for 48 <br />cars. The space in front <br />of the <br />garage can and will be used for <br />visitor <br />parking. <br />8. With respect to traffic capacities, traffic generation, and turning <br />movements, it appears that the most significant factor is that tho peak <br />flour for vehicles leaving the site will be generally from 2:30 p.m. to <br />3:30 p.m. rather than coinciding with the normal peak hour of traffic <br />on the public street system from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. It would <br />appear that left turn movements exit' g the site on Lexington Avenue <br />will be the critical factor. The tr 'ic analysis concludes that under <br />these conditions, the traffic will be wanageable as long as these hours <br />remain as such. It appears that this may well be thT.: case. <br />