My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01900
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1900-1999
>
pf_01900
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 8:57:27 AM
Creation date
2/21/2024 8:56:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1900
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />rrn <br />a L/ <br />Gordon Beseth: Statement Regarding 1225 Josephine R . <br />Szo(Al J�OU�,�2 vvAL <br />1. File #1494'�).5/7;84 Originial variance and shoreline permit. <br />2. <br />w <br />R��osh <br />11/13/84 Applied for 6 month extension of Jr1494. <br />No building permit was applied for and the variance <br />3, % expired. <br />/7 W <br />'File #16.89 9/3/86 Minor VAriance Board approval �o�� - x red <br />r <br />t gyp/' <br />G elf - - - - .. - , - sd /err) <br />lshline permit. <br />'�G� <br />M A� i„ M (vri <br />3. Building Permit #24148 issued on 3/9/87 <br />details/conditions on,perml <br />al or variance and,; <br />60 <br />�r0 � by <br />by Gordon Beseth. (Note <br />4. Building Permit'#25073 issued on 3/1/88 by James McFall. (Note' <br />��,�J /details/conditions on permit application). <br />0��dr <br />Jim McFall indicated that no final plans were <br />presented at the time. Mr. Rekuski told Jim McFall <br />!~ -that there were no deviations from the original plans <br />s�o��� that were presented for the variance and shoreline <br />We <br />O-I- permit approval. <br />14 V� Sys, <br />A set of rafter truss drawings were presented after <br />this permit according to James McFalls recollection. <br />The more complete set of plan elevations were <br />presented at some unspecified time and apparently <br />were mislaid until Mr. Larson came to City Hall <br />around April 1., 1988 to review the Rekuski job <br />progress. Mr. Larson had discussed a bay window <br />projection in an earlier conversation in March, <br />1988, and I.said it would not be allowed. Mr. <br />Rekuski was informed, and the window projection was <br />eliminated. <br />At this April 1, 1988 meeting between Mr. Larson and <br />myself, I went through every available file, plans, <br />permits, etc. that were on file. They indicated that <br />the original concept of the variance and lakeshore <br />permit had inadvertently changed regarding the <br />original old portion of the house. <br />I told Mr. Larson that Mr. Rekuski would be <br />contacted immediately, and that a meeting between <br />all parties would be set up to discuss this apparent <br />mix'up in these construction plans. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.