pf_01900 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Gordon Beseth Page 2 5. Mr. Rekuski sent me a short letter dated April 4, 1988 explaining what happened, and that he would be present at a meeting set up for April 13, 1988. s. 6. This meeting was held on April 13, 1988 with the city planning` staff. Those present were Howard Dahlgren, Rick Jopke, Gordon Beseth, Frank Rekuski and Vaughn Larson. All items were presented, discussed, and solutions arrived at. It' was agreed by all that a new minor variance would be processed regarding the 3 foot set back previously approved for that garage, and this revised site plan would be reprocessed as a shoreline development application. Mr. Larson noted that he did not object to the development as now proposed. Everyone was in agreement and Mr. Rekuski was told to proceed with the revised variance and shoreline application. Mr. Rekuski was contacted on several occasions by myself to review the progress of completing the revised shoreline application. Mr. Rekuski was informed of the importance of this minor variance and shoreline procedure, and he informed me that Mr. Larson was becoming increasingly reluctant and hostile at times and would not sign the minor variance request. Around the first or second week of June, 1988 Mr. Rekuski delivered a copy of the minor variance and a check to the City of Roseville and told me Mr. Larson would not sign the variance request. I told Mr. Rekuski that if Mr. Larson would not sign for the minor variance, a regular variance procedure process was the only alternative. Mr. Rekuski continued to try to reach an agreement with Mr. Larson and around the second week of July, 1988 it became evident to all parties that Mr. Larson would not sign for a minor variance. I told Mr. Rekuski that he must resolve this issue either by filing for a regular variance, or by compliance with the original variance and shoreline application. A regular variance was applied for and filed with Mr. Richard Jopke on August 30, 1988. On October 6, 1988 a "red tag" was issued to inform Mr. Rekuski that any future construction would be stopped and the building should not be occupied until the variance procedure completed.