My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01900
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1900-1999
>
pf_01900
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 8:57:27 AM
Creation date
2/21/2024 8:56:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1900
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ITEM NO.: - <br />Department Approval: Manager Reviewed: Agenda Section: <br />Reports and Recommendations <br />Item Descrip ion: Frank Rekuski request for a setback variance <br />and shoreline building permit at 1225 <br />Josephine Road. <br />The Roseville Planning Commission at its October 12, 1988 meeting, <br />on a 6-1 vote recommended denial of the variance request to have a 3 <br />foot side yard setback instead of the required 5 foot setback. The <br />basis of the denial recommendation is that there was no demonstrated <br />hardship, that the house is too close to the lot line and that <br />there are violations present on the site including retaining walls, <br />improper location of the dwelling, and construction without proper <br />permits. The Planning Commission also stated that the dwelling <br />should be returned to the size permitted by the previously granted <br />variances and building permits issued. The Commission further <br />suggested that the Council seek the advice of the City Attorney <br />concerning the legal options and liabilities that the City may have <br />in this matter. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny a variance for a 3 <br />foot side yard setback at 1225 Josephine <br />Road. If the Council wishes to deny this <br />variance request, a motion to direct the <br />City Attorney to draft the proper <br />findings of fact to support the denial, <br />would be in order. <br />NOTE: The City Attorney has been provided background information <br />regarding Mr. Rekuski's application, and has been asked <br />to be prepared to respond to the legal implications of <br />approving or denying Mr. Rekuski's request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.