My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01897
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1800-1899
>
pf_01897
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 9:25:32 AM
Creation date
2/21/2024 9:24:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1897
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
John <br />T. Jenkins and Alan Deutsch, Case No. 1873 Page 2 <br />6. <br />It is likely that there is no need to ever build a public street on the <br />right-of-way proposed to be vacated. However, we suggest that it <br />would be important to consider the retention of a utility easement and <br />a pedestrian easement of an appropriate width. We suggest that a 20 <br />i <br />foot easement for this purpose might be considered minimal. <br />7. <br />We have enlarged a portion of the aerial photographs that' show this <br />a <br />area in the City. We have indicated the street right-of-way "in question <br />on the aerial photograph. You will note that a- driveway serving the <br />lot to the east has been constructed on the public right -of -away. We do <br />not know the exact location of phis driveway. This information would <br />be helpful if a public utility vehicle is going Lo gain access to this <br />. <br />area by using this. driveway. <br />Y <br />8. <br />In summary, it would appear important to protect the ;public interests. <br />and provide pedestrian and utility access on a reasonable basis. Care <br />should be taken so as not to give away the pu'-)lic's right to make:,its,:Y< <br />way over a parcel of land. It would appear obvijus, however; that the <br />development of a public street for normal vehicular purposes will likely <br />never be necessary on this portion of Delwood Avenue. <br />s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.