My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01868
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1800-1899
>
pf_01868
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 10:14:43 AM
Creation date
2/21/2024 10:13:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1868
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Everest Property Management Company, Case No. 1868 Page 2 <br />4. We have talked about the parking since conversion of the <br />entire structure for retail use would require additional <br />parking space, depending upon the actual retail use <br />included. A drawing has been submitted, a copy of which <br />is attached, and indicates expansion of the parking space' <br />to the west from 15 spaces to 33 spaces, a net increase of <br />18 spaces for the site. Existing parking accommodations <br />for the total site is 61 spaces. The additional 18 spaces <br />would produce a total of 79 spaces. <br />5. The existing parking setback under the Industrial zone is <br />20 feet, and the building setback required is 40 feet. <br />The existing development conforms to these requirements. <br />The B-4 District requires a parking setback of 15 feet, <br />thus, the parking expansion as proposed can be <br />accommodated within the regulations. <br />M <br />Attached is a copy of a statement from the applicant <br />outlining his proposal. you will note that the applicant <br />suggests that for the uses as immediately contemplated, <br />the parking that exists will be adequate. This may well <br />be true, at least for a period of time since The Tile Shop <br />proposed is generally a "large ticket" operation requiring <br />more parking The City's parking requirement for retail <br />space is 5 spaces per 1,000 gross. on that basis, the <br />entire site would require 147 spaces (if all of the space <br />were devoted to typical retail use). <br />7. If additional parking is added now, there will be a <br />substantial reduction in grass area and an increase in <br />asphalt area. Since portions of the site may continue for <br />office warehouse purposes not requiring additional <br />parking, it may be appropriate to consider rezoning the <br />land and approval of the Special Use Permit without <br />requiring additional parking at this time. As each use is <br />added or changed, the appropriate amount of parking will <br />be required as a part of the building permit process. <br />Therefore, it may be appropriate to approve the <br />application as proposed with the condition that if <br />additional parking is needed, the 18 spaces will be added <br />at the discretion of the City. In other words, the City <br />would notify the managers of this property at a point in <br />time that a parking problem is perceived (usually as <br />evidence by excessive parking on the contiguous <br />right-of-way). The other option would be to require the <br />addition of the expanded parking at this time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.