Laserfiche WebLink
Gerald H. Kaufhold, Case No. 1857 <br />Page 2 <br />indicates otherwise. They have the money and the desire <br />to relocate in their own facilities and have, in fact, <br />reduced the number of students currently at the Lexington <br />Avenue site by one-half for enrollment this fall. <br />4. We suggest that developing a parcel of land in a first <br />string suburb virtually surrounded by single-family <br />development without a total long range plan is unfair to <br />the surrounding land owners, not in the public interests, <br />and not an intelligent approach on the part of the <br />developer. No community in the Metropolitan Area that we <br />know of would seriously pursue such a solution. This <br />observation is based on 30 years of doing private and <br />public sector work in this and other Metropolitan Areas. <br />5. Mr. Kaufhold has reiterated to us verbally with the advice <br />of an appraiser,_that.the remainder of the land is a <br />"commercial site". It is this kind of supposition <br />(already turned down by the City) that leads to the <br />concern relating to the platting of a portion of the site <br />for single-family homes without regard to an intelligent <br />solution for the remainder of the land. If additional <br />areas of the site are to be developed for single-family <br />purposes, for instance the platting of the land as <br />proposed utilizing the street frontage to the west and <br />south, may be a mistake. Mr. Kaufhold's position is that <br />having tried two development programs involving <br />substantial Business zoning and having failed in each, his <br />only alternative is to plat the developable single-family <br />lots and worry about the rest later. The question is <br />whether this is a reasonable and intelligent way to go for <br />both the developer and the City. In the process of <br />approving a preliminary plat, the City is to determine <br />that the division of the land and the uses in which it is <br />to be puc are reasonable and appropriate and in the public <br />interests. It would seem that determination is impossible <br />to make without a reliable determination of all of the <br />land uses involved within the relatively near future. <br />