Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 4-11-88 <br />ITEM NO.: <br />Department,Ap royal: Manager Reviewed: Agenda Section: <br />Hearing <br />Item Description: Arthur Schuster/Richard Webb request for a <br />comprehensive plan amendment from low density <br />to nigh density residential, rezoning from R-1 <br />to R-3A, special use permit for an alternative <br />residential facility for the elderly, and <br />variances to parking set back, the number of <br />off street parking stalls provided, and to <br />exceed density requirements and a shoreline <br />permit. <br />The Roseville Planning Commission considered this matter at it's <br />April 6, 1988 meeting and recommended on a 4 to 3 vote that the <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment be denied based on the following <br />findings of fact: <br />1. The proposed land use features are in a excess of the density <br />allowed. <br />2. The proposed structure is to massive for the site. <br />3. The proposed parking variance is too extensive. <br />The Planning Commission further recommended denial of the zoning <br />special use permit)and variances on a 4 to 3 vote based on the <br />following findings of fact: <br />1. That the zoning and land use is inconsistent with the <br />comprehensive plan. <br />2. The building is too massive. <br />F� <br />3. The variance to parking is to extensive. <br />4. The hardship for the variances to parking set back and <br />density was not established. <br />Subsequent to the Planning jmmission hearing on this matter, it <br />has been determined that comprehensive plan change is not <br />necessary. Mr. Dahlgren will be developing correspondence in this <br />respect. <br />