Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING REPORT <br />DATE: <br />CASE NUMBER: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />• <br />6 January 1988 <br />1816 <br />Norm Vinnes <br />West Side of Oxford <br />Between County Road C-2 <br />and Judith Avenue (see <br />sketch) <br />Division of Existing <br />Platted Lot <br />W <br />1. The Vinnes' property (Lot 15 of Block 1 in Roseville <br />Heights) has 132 feet of frontage on Oxford Street. The <br />depth is 132.99. As you will note from the copy of a <br />portion of Roseville's section map, the single-family lots <br />in this vicinity vary from 79.4 feet (on the south side) <br />to 88 feet (on the north side). Lots across the street <br />are mostly 83.5 feet in width. <br />2. Mr. Vinnes proposes to divide his existing single-family <br />lot into two lots, the southerly most lot will have a <br />frontage of 67 feet and the northerly most lot will have a <br />width of 65 feet. The existing home will occupy the <br />southerly most lot with a setback on the north side of 7.8 <br />feet. The side yard setback required in this portion of <br />the City is 5 feet since these properties were platted <br />prior to May 1959 (when the new ordinances were enacted). <br />3. As you know, it is the City's policy to consider lot <br />divisions less than the normal 85 feet that is required <br />for interior lots if such lots are reasonably in scale <br />with the neighborhood. Here, of course, a proposed 65 <br />foot lot is smaller than the lots in the immediate area. <br />The 65 foot lot proposed is 23 percent less than the 85 <br />:feet required. <br />However, the existing 132 foot lot is 55 percent larger <br />than the 85 foot required. Thus, it would seem that a <br />case could be made noting that the retention of the <br />existing lot as is produces an ovary ized proportion <br />greater than the ratio of the undersized proportion. <br />Stating it another way, the lot is more out of scale with <br />the existing neighborhood from a percentage standpoint <br />than the lot division proposal. <br />