My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01809
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1800-1899
>
pf_01809
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 11:44:54 AM
Creation date
2/21/2024 11:43:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1809
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• ROSEVILLE eLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Wednesday, December 2, 1987 <br />The December 2, 1987, regular meeting of the Roseville Planning <br />Commission was called to order by Chairperson Pat Johnson at 7:30 <br />1,�).m. <br />Members Present: Johnson, Berry, Stokes, DeBenedet, Goedeke, and <br />Moeller. <br />Members Absent: Maschka. <br />Staff Present: Waldron, Dahlgren, and Janisch. <br />Council Present: Cushman (liaison) and Kehr. <br />Approval of Minutes <br />Berry moved, Goedeke seconded, that the minutes of the regular <br />meeting of the Rosevili.le Planning Commission held Wednesday, <br />November 4, 1987, be approved with the following modification: <br />On Page 6, third paragraph, the name referred to should be Terren <br />as opposed to Johnson. <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Johnson, <br />Moeller. <br />Nays: None. <br />Berry, Stokes, DeBenedet, Goedeke and <br />Planning File 1809 <br />Kraus -Anderson request for variance at 2057 <br />North Snelling <br />Avenue. <br />Presentation <br />Dahlgren showed the location of the building. <br />This was the old <br />Rose Bowl that was built before 1959, and has <br />been unused for a <br />number of years. It is currently zoned B-3, <br />which allows the <br />bowling alley.and the current proposed retail. <br />Dahlgren pointed out that a permit was issued <br />for the new <br />building modifications, which the City <br />Attorney deemed <br />appropriate. It was later ascertained that the <br />modifications did <br />not include modifications to the parking lot. <br />Even though such <br />modifications weren't required, the developer <br />did decide to clean <br />up the lot with landscape and islands. It <br />was decided that <br />because of the City's request to modify the <br />parking lot, the <br />respective variances were needed. <br />The variances requested are from ten feet to <br />zero feet on the <br />north side of the building, from thirty feet <br />to zero feet on the <br />south side of the building, from fifteen to <br />seven feet on the <br />south side of the parking lot, from ten feet <br />to zero feet on the , <br />west side of the parking lot, from five feet <br />to zero feet on the <br />north side of the parking lot, and from one <br />hundred parking <br />spaces to ninety-five parking spaces. <br />Stokes asked why weren't these variances <br />obtained first. <br />Dahlgren pointed out that the developer did not <br />have to clean up <br />the parking lot, this was a suggestion on the <br />part of the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.