pf_01809 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Kraus -Anderson, Case No. 1809 Page 2 5. 6. 7. S. At that meeting, it was agreed that Mr. Capp would landscape the front 30 feet of the site, eliminating parking that was previously there prior to the reconstruction of Snelling Avenue. Along the west side of the building, a landscaped area of 9-1/2 feet would be provided to somewhat enhance the appearance of the facade of the structure. It was agreed that the south side of the parking lot would be moved 7 feet from the south property line (15 feet normally required) since there was adequate depth to the parking lot (north -south dimension) to reduce the width by that amount and still have the parking spaces and isles conform to City standards. They further agreed to place two curbed islands in the parking area so as to break up the asphalt area. They also agreed to curb the entire parking lot area as currently required by the City. The retail space at approximately 202000 square feet would require 1.00 parking spaces. Ninety-five are proposed as shown in the attached drawing. Therefore, a variance of 5 parking spaces is required. As you will note at the site, the application ,was filed after the fact. That is to say, the bulk of the work has been done. Processing of the variances that are required at this time would result in the building and development being legal and out of the nonconforming classification. The variances required would be as follows: a) From 10 feet to 0 feet on the north side of the building. b) From 30 feet to 0 feet on the south side of the building. c) From 15 feet to 7 feet on the south side of the parking lot. d) From 10 feet to 0 feet on the west side of the parking lot. e) From 5 feet to 0 feet on the north side of the parking lot. Additional landscaping not indicated on the plan submitted may well be in order. Theoretically the redevelopment of the parking lot and the renovation and reconstruction of the building would trigger the requirement for a sidewalk along Skillman Avenue, as well as Snelling Avenue. The plan submitted does not indicate this sidewalk. If the sidewalk is not to be constructed, a variance to that effect should also be considered. When we first met with Mr. Capp, we suggested that perhaps tearing down the building and starting over may be appropriate for this well located site in Roseville. Following the issuance of the building permit to remodel, however, the intent was to improve the parking and site conditions to the extent it might be practical under the circumstan:.-es.