Laserfiche WebLink
INCORPORATED <br />CONSULTING PLANNERS <br />LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS <br />300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH <br />SUITE 210 <br />MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 <br />612 ,339.3300 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: 14 September 1989 <br />TO: Roseville City Staff <br />FROM: Howard Dahlgren <br />RE: Har Mar Mall Landscape Renovation <br />The Proposed Landscape Renovation and Planting Plan for the Har Mar Mall, dated August <br />1989, has been reviewed by our firm. As part of the review Howard Dahlgren and Wally <br />Case, one of our Landscape Architects, inspected the site on Friday, September 8. <br />We concluded that the plant material proposed to be added to the landscape buffer strip <br />along the south and west sides of the property is acceptable as long as the existing large <br />spruce trees are preserved. <br />A telephone discussion with Ed Reid, Har Mar's Landscape Architect, was required to <br />clarify their plan and to verify that the existing large spruce trees will remain in all <br />parts of the buffer zone. <br />The plantings proposed for the landscape buffer along the east side of the Mall will not <br />provide adequate buffering where Belmont, Skillman, and Shryer end at the buffer strip. <br />The landscaping in this area is not approved until additional plantings are included to <br />improve the screening of the views at the end of these streets. <br />Subsequent to our determination that the landscaping proposed for the eastern buffer strip <br />was not acceptable and with the approval of City Staff, Mr. Case met with Mr. Reid on <br />site to consider our suggestions for improving the plan by adding plants at the ends of the <br />affected streets. Their meeting resulted in Mr. Reid agreeing to prepare a revised plan <br />which will place a total of seven additional trees at the end of these streets. These <br />additional plants increase the approved total number of trees from 64 to 71. <br />Based on comments from City Staff and the Har Mar Center Manager, we understand that <br />the proposed plan was developed through a process that involved meeting with the <br />neighbors four times over the summer and that at the last meeting the neighbors were <br />asked to inspect the plan and to sign an approval sheet. We understand that twelve of <br />the eighteen neighbors present signed and that the remaining six have refused to sign. <br />