My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01735
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1700-1799
>
pf_01735
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 1:24:27 PM
Creation date
2/21/2024 1:23:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1735
Planning Files - Type
Special Use Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Shelard Grop <br />STS Project No. 94039-XA <br />July 10, 1987 <br />Page 2 <br />except in the area of the <br />highest deflection of 150 <br />feet of the native soils <br />feet had HNU deflections <br />• <br />foundation subcut excavation. The <br />ppm was observed in the upper 2 <br />in test pit 2. Native soils at 17 <br />of 1 to 2 ppm. <br />The petroleum product which was encountered appears to be the <br />result of a spill which occurred at the site during the time <br />that the area was used as a gas service station. The con- <br />figuration of the spill appears to indicate that leakage <br />occurred in a relatively small area, migrating vertically <br />through the existing fill soils on -site until native soil and <br />groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 15 <br />feet. The petroleum product appears to be confined to a <br />relatively small area. Petroleum product has been attenuated <br />in the soils and no free product was observed. It appears <br />that significant biodegradation of the petroleum product has <br />been occurring. <br />Previous site evaluations at this location included Subsur- <br />face Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation <br />Report dated October 14, 1986; Chemical Analysis of a Soil <br />Sample, which was noted to have faint chemical odors, report <br />dated November 6, 1986; and an Air Photo Evaluation of the <br />site, report date,J March 9, 1987, STS File 194039. Copies of <br />portions of these reports are included for your review. <br />The premise that the petroleum contamination is of limited <br />extent is evident by the soil borings which were conducted at <br />the site. No areas of gross contamination were identified in <br />any of the test borings. Chemical testing performed on a <br />sample obtained from boring 2 confirms the fact that the <br />contamination in these borings is minor. It is estimated <br />that a total of 300 to 400 cubic yards of soil contaminted <br />with petroleum product exists in this area. <br />Based upon the examination of the site conditions we recom- <br />mend that the contaminated soils present at the site be <br />remediated in the following manner. <br />o Excavate the contaminated soils with HNU deflections <br />greater than 10 parts per million. <br />o Land spread these soils in thin lifts in the area of the <br />proposed parking lot. The soils should be disked <br />periodically in order to assist in volatilizing the <br />petroleum product. <br />0 Soils will be compacted and become part of a fill sec- <br />tion beneath the asphalt parking area once HNU deflec- <br />tions of less than 10 ppm are obtained. The asphalt <br />parking lot will minimize infiltration of water through <br />these soils and minimize any impact due to leaching of <br />the contaminants from them. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.