pf_01650 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Pinute's oftheArdenHillsRegularPlanningCamnission Meeting, 6-5-91 age 5 CASE ,#91-04 (Cont'd) Member Peterson questioned if the resident is opposed to the Arden Hills portion of the Concept Plan. Larson advised he is not familiar with the Arden Hills portion of Campus and therefore is not opposed to the plan. He indicated the athletic activities do generate noise into his neighborhood. Gary Johnson, 3030 Shorewood Drive, Roseville, expressed concern regarding soil erosion. He requested an explanation of the PUD process and if construction of each individual building will be reviewed by the C mnission. Wliniecki explained the PUD process and explained each building is reviewed by Commission as construction occurs. She noted that the buildings must meet zoning code requirements and plans are reviewed by City staff and consultants. WTiniecki pointed out that the Site Plan Review of the building construction does not require a public hearing, as requi&�ed in the PUD Concept regulations. She also advised that RC review is required as part of the application process. Planner Bergly noted that the Roseville portion of the PUD may have entirely different regulations for construction upon approval of the Concept plan for that' portion of the Cargx1s; suggested Johnson contact Roseville. Vern Albertson, 3103 Asbury, Roseville, stated he has resided at this location for 27 years and preferred the relocation of the tennis courts. He indicated .the former administration of the College stated during a public hearing that nothing would be placed within 100 feet of any abutting residential property. He questioned if spectator stands and lights will be placed near the tennis courts and if there are plans to construct a transmitting. tower near the radio station. Erickson stated the radio station will transmit from the Shoreview, Golden Valley and Oakdale towers. wini-ecki stated the tennis courts will be addressed by the City of Roseville. Tire Callaghan, 3062 Shorewood Lane, Roseville, explained he obtained a copy of the PUD approved by the City of Roseville and noted a significant difference in the plan displayed this evening and the approved Roseville plan. He noted there is an agreement between the College and Roseville to close the entrance at Snelling and Lydia to vehicle traffic. He indicated that in the past the College not adhered to agreements made during such discussions and has not controlled erosion. Callaghan stated there is nothing shown on the plan for additional ponding or sedimentation areas, as required by Ramsey County. Fsickson stated the proposal to close the entrance at Snelling and Lydia was modified and the City of Roseville recommended the modification. He advised that the RCWD will review the construction plans, however, approval of the Concept Plan is the first step in the process. A resident from the audience agreed with the explanation provided by F.cickson relative to the modified entrance. Annette Philips, 3004 Shorewood Lane, Roseville, expressed concern relative to erosion along the lakeshore and suggested the Library Wilding be moved further, east, to aeco;m odate the roadway in its present location and to prevent further erosion.