Laserfiche WebLink
t . r <br />WILFRED AND MURIEL SPEAR, CASE 1646 <br />Page 2 <br />County, however, does <br />indicated on the plats. not <br />P allow such easement to be <br />to be Therefore, the easement will have <br />provided for by a separate instrument <br />(written and <br />recorded easement) from the owner to the Cit . <br />quite normal and is routinely done as a y This is <br />for such easements. means to provide <br />4• Thus, the proposal as currently submitt <br />and constitutes an improvement ed satisfies the staffs concern <br />could thus be approved as submitted and date) a' well. <br />conditions that the easement on theThe Provision <br />d April 1ti�, 1986, with the <br />Purposes be provided by separate instrument preliminary and plat for walkway <br />permitted crossing the 45 degree angle lot line at the <br />Count driveways not be <br />y Road B and Cleveland Avenue. l�itersection of <br />5• It would appear that Mr. <br />options relating to his previ uslyrsubmitt d cerned by the di,:� <br />well b " -ussion of <br />y resubmitting an improved Proposal. He has responded <br />Proposal, including specific solution to <br />the drainage and easement concerns. <br />Planning Commission hearing, Mr. Spear may <br />can proceed smoothly without additional concern that the Platting at the <br />g process <br />