Laserfiche WebLink
00or 'Ile <br />2660 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TELEPHONE 484-337 1 (iS e v I <br />MlNNFSOT A SS 1 13 <br />Th: Steve North, Assistant City Manager <br />From: David P. Drown,.Assistant City Engineer <br />Re: Cormients on February Planning Commission items <br />Date: January 22, 1985 <br />Planning File 1570---Kehr proposed townhouse development: <br />1. I understand the property is proposed to be rezoned to R-2. As such, <br />that zoning does not require the construction of a sidewalk. <br />However, the townhouse district does r <br />Council and planning commission may wish toersidewalk construction. <br />constructed. equest�a sidewalk <br />2. No large scale utility plan was submitted, and the small scale <br />drawing is too ru rky to read. Our major utility concerns involved <br />looping of the internal water system through a future watermain <br />extension in the park to the south, and providing more design <br />information on the private storm sewer that must be constructed from <br />the site to the intersection of County Road C and Dale Street. <br />3. Additional charges on this project total $1,643.40. This covers the <br />cost of the storm sewers assessment which was assessed at a single <br />family rate only. <br />4. `.tile north -south dimensionof 442.18 ft.-.409.1� <br />to conflict with Ramsey County section map trecordstered ,l wh chrawistatestseems <br />hat <br />is the dimension of the property when measured to the center line of <br />County Road C. Subtracting 33 feetlof right-of-way arrives at an <br />apparent north -south dimension of 9A .18 feet. Mr. Kehr indicates he <br />has field varified the north -south dimension, and indicates that the <br />442 foot dimension is what exists in the field. We suggest that a <br />qualified surveyor be involved to determine the actual dimension in <br />the field and resolve the ambiguity. <br />If the 409.18 dimension is the correct dimension, the total site square <br />footage is 67,514 square feet, or slightly less than the 71,500 feet <br />square required to meet ordinance density requirement for 13 dwelling <br />units. <br />5. The street easement shown on the plan is a <br />mot. It should be understood that ueither thheYconstruction of the <br />roadway no, the set -backs provided ccnform to Roseville standards for <br />a public street. <br />Planning File 1571---Willmus request for sign variance: <br />No comments. <br />