pf_01570 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PLANNING REPORT DATE: 6 February 1985 CASE, NUMBER: 1570-85 APPLICANT: Al Kehr LOC TT_ON: South of County Road C, Westerly of Dale Street ACTION REQUESTED: RP-Loning from R-1 to R-2 Special Use Permit for PUD Approval of Preliminary Plat Variance to Density PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The applicant proposes to construct 15 townhouses on a tract of land owned by the applicant with frontage of 165.02 feet on County Road C and a depth of 409.18 feet, exclusive of 33 feet of right-of-way for County Road C. The property is contiguous along a rof is boundary with the Roseville Legion Club which land isozon d Btl. westerly oethe south the land is contiguous to a portion of Central Park. Portions of the boundary on the west and the land to the east are zoned R-1, as is the property in question. 2. Attached is a series of reduced drawings indicating the development plan, grading, plan, landscape plan, floor plans, elevations, and sections of the proposed units. In general, the development proposal is the same as that which was reviewed by the City in the spring of 1984 and ultimately denied by the Council. 3. The current plans include a slight modification illustrated on the second page of the drawings submitted, illustrating an enlargement of the roadway area at the southwest corner of the roadway system. This drawing submitted by the applicant delineates the geometrics of a ladder truck (fire fighting vehicle) in a turn -around movement. Other than that change, the proposal is the same. 4. For members of the Planning Commission and Council who may wish to familiarize themselves by reviewing past reports and details, reference is made to February 1984 and March 1984 planning reports. 5. The development, now and as previously proposed, it predicated on the concept that the private street proposed in the applicant's development would be extended easterly to Dale Street through a series of large, deep lots that exist to the east. At staff's discussions with the applicant conducted since last spring, we have suggested that getting a firm commitment from these landowners to pursue this street extension and resultant development would be very helpful in solving some of the problems apparent with the last proposal.