Laserfiche WebLink
PLAT -KING REPORT <br />DATE: <br />CASE NUMDER: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />5 December 1984 <br />1559-84 <br />First Grand Avenue Liquors, Inc. <br />Southeast Corner of County Road D <br />and Old Highway 8 <br />Approval of Special Use Permit for <br />Off. -Sale Liquor Store <br />Variance to Parking Setback <br />1. This property is an old service station site with multiple driveway <br />access to County road D in the north and Old Highway 8 on the northwest. <br />The applicant proposes to expand the existing 1,955 square foot structure <br />with a 3,000 square foot addition to be occupied by an off -sale liquor <br />store. Attached are copies of the proposed site development plan and a <br />perspective indicating the proposed development to be done by Fred <br />Thorne, developer and owner of the property. <br />2. You will recall the recently approved and adopted off -sale liquor <br />ordinance allows land in the B-2, B-39 and Shopping Center district to be <br />used for an off -sale liquor store if contained in a shopping center <br />structure exceeding 40,000 square feet in area. A free standing liquor <br />store such as the one proposed, requires a special use permit by the City <br />Council. The property in question is zoned B-3 and the applicant is <br />seeking approval of the special use permit. <br />3. The applicant is also seeking a variance to the 15 foot setback <br />requirement for parking areas contiguous to a public right-of-way. You <br />will notice on the site plan that the proposed dimension and variance <br />sought is to reduce the setback to five (5) feet. Obviously, this is <br />done because of the extremely small site, and the location of the <br />existing structure on the lot. the parking required for the total <br />structure which will be approximately 69000 square feet when completed, <br />is 30 spaces. The site development design indicates accommodation for 32 <br />spaces, and two more if the landscape triangle in front of the entrances <br />is eliminated. <br />Depending upon the use of the remainder of the building (approximately <br />one-half) it is likely that at most times the 22 parking spaces along the <br />southerly portion of the property will be adequate. The parallel parking <br />spots indicated for the driveway along the northwest side of the site are <br />not efficient parking spaces though it could be rationalized that these <br />would be used less than the more efficient spaces on the south <br />(perpendicular parking). <br />