My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01547
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01547
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2024 9:14:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2024 9:02:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1547
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tcamf <br />1 <br />tr-in cities association ® metai finishers <br />1 <br />1 AFFILIATED WITH THE NATIONAL ASSN. OF M[TAL FINISHERS <br />1 <br />I <br />March 15, 1933 <br />John Harrington <br />Resource Recovery Task Force <br />Metropolitan Council <br />300 Metro Square Building <br />St. Paul, Minnesota <br />Re: Industry Comments on the Work of the Task Force <br />Dear Mr. Harrington: <br />The Twin Cities Association of Metal Finishers has supported <br />the Task Force since its inception. We have had representatives <br />on the Task Force, provided donations for the Phase I study, and <br />followed your progress. Since the completion of the Phase I <br />report in December, our member companies have felt that they <br />needed time to discuss its implications and to get more definitive <br />about our requirements for additional information that we need <br />to arrive at an investment decision concerning the central <br />resource recovery concept. Because we are in constant contact <br />with the Task Force Chair, Dan Shuster, we have kept him informed <br />about our concerns regarding more detailed economic and engineer- <br />ing work necessary to give us confidence that the central facility <br />could be built and that we had reliable fee schedules and in -plant <br />modification engineering requirements. We need more information <br />soon. <br />I can speak for our Association in that we definitely want the <br />Task Force to continue to analyze the recovery approach and to <br />report its findings on a timely basis to our companies. We are <br />serious about our responsibilities to implement water pre- <br />treatment in our plants and see the central facility as a <br />potentially valuable service to our industry. <br />I directed three TCA11F members to call all of our members to <br />solicit donations to continue the Phase II work and to match the <br />grant provided by Hennepin.I.County. We want to procede quickly <br />so that additional customer fees and engineering information is <br />available by early April. We must have time to arrive at our <br />design decision su that we can submit our intentions to the <br />Metropolitan Waste Control Commission by May 1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.