Laserfiche WebLink
s • <br />CASE NUMBER: 1500-84 Page 2 <br />APPLICANT: Commers-Klodt <br />people who had purchased the site from M & M were, of course, aware of <br />the temporary nature of their vehicular access and sewer connection. <br />When informed of these facts, the Commers-Klodt people, along with their <br />realtor, Roger Rohrer, did go through a great deal of effort to purchase <br />the three properties involved, including the Marabella parcel which was <br />the key to being able to construct the cul-de-sac without condemning <br />anyone's property. <br />5. The applicant's have filed a petition with the City requesting a <br />feasibility study for the construction of the cul-de-sac and the utilities <br />within it to provide the appropriate services to their site, Vertimag, and <br />the Reim site to the east. Thus, the applicants have performed a <br />considerable service to the City in putting the properties together and <br />proposing the public improvement project for the cul-de-sac. The <br />applicants also have provided a larger area for the ponding that will be <br />required on the northern portion of the land involved. The Engineering <br />Department informs us that subject to final calculations, which have not <br />been submitted as yet by the applicant, that this pond may have to be <br />slightly larger than proposed. In any case, the need for this pond has <br />imposed a hardship to a degree on the development of this land inasmuch as <br />€} shifts the building further south and reduces the amount of land that <br />can be developed. A part of this problom relates to the previous develop- <br />ment of the ,site to the north (the Vertimag building). <br />b. In view of these" constraints, the Applicant proposes to build what is <br />cowa&,nly known in the area are a "high-tech" building, with approximately 35 <br />parco,nt office and 65 percent ancillary storage space. Such structures <br />are sometimes kncmn in the as "Office -Service Building'"+ and are different <br />from the typical office -warehouse inasmuch as the ceiling heights ar,- <br />considerably lower. There is considerable demand for such structures In <br />tlee metropolitan Art- today. <br />7. The building can be sited in a manner an as to conform to all. City <br />requirements including the appropriate: parking ratios. Due to the long" <br />narrow shape of the property, they are anking that the setback on the cast <br />side contiguous to tfie now street eight-of-wAy be 15 feet, the same as is <br />required in the buoiness district. Normally, this distance in an <br />industrial district: would be 20 fdot, except in this case where it is in <br />tile: "front" of a building, the setback should normally be 40 fact. <br />S. on the south aide of the building, they are proposing, a 15 font setback <br />from the existing right -of -waxy which is 43 feet fr*m the center line of <br />County Read C (a3ast-west section line). flare again, it is a matter of <br />attemmmpting, to compensate for the loss of land on the north end of the <br />building for the: drainage site. On this question, the first point is that <br />there should be 5.5 additional feet of dedication inasmuch as the Ramsey <br />County highway system plan calla f.`at 49.5 ='ct of dedication from the <br />center line of County Road C. Existing dedication is 43 feet. <br />9. in the applicant's letters and statement of proposal (copies attached) <br />they note that the setback from County Road C for the structures located <br />north of County Road C in Saint Anthony (properties immediately to the <br />