pf_01414 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

i a " 2 February 1983 PLANNING REPORT CASE NUMBER: 1414-83 APPLICANT: Carl and Marylou Evers LOCATION: Northeast Corner St. Stephen Street and County Road B ACTION REQUESTED: Division of a Lot PLANNING DERATIONS: 1. Carl and Marylou Evers live in their home which is located on the northerl side of a lot which y measures 158 feet of frontage on St. Stephen Street and 185 feet of frontage on County Road B. This property is located directly west of a lot that was recently subdivided (approved by the Planning Commission and Council). That lot recently subdivided and the proposed subdivision is shown on the attached copy the, of section map. At the time.of the division of the land to the west, they did not oppose that subdivision inasmuch as they were prop osing to divide their lot as well. '• They propose to divide their land by creating a 78 foot frontage lot for their existing home, and an 80 foot lot for the new lot to the south. As was done in the case for the land to the ` west, ten feet of dedication is required for County Road B. This would reduce the corner lot to a 70 foot width. Given these dimensions, the lot area for the northerly lot (containing the existing house) would be 14,430 square feet (11,000 square feet required). The southerly lot with the 75 foot frontage would have 12,950 square feet (12,500 square feet required). 2. Thus, it is apparent that each lot will have land area exceeding the minimum requirements. q For a new platted area, the lot frontage for the interior lot (northerly) would be 85 feet and the frontage for the corner lot would be 100 feet. The lots on the remainder of St. Stephen Street are mostly in the 100 foot to 129 foot frontage class. The smallest lot in the area is the recently divided lot at the northwest corner of Fulham and County Road B which has frontage of 85 feet. 3. The basic question then becomes whether or not it is more reasonable to retain the lot as is with a frontage of 158 feet (148'feet if ten feet is ultimately acquired for right-of-way) or split the lot as proposed, or some variation thereof. It is the intention of the Evers to deed restrict the lot so that the new home constructed on the property would not extend closer to St. Stephen Street than their existing home. This setback is 58 S v feet. It is physically possible to construct a home on the newly created lot inasmuch as there would be a 30 foot setback off County Road B and a ten foot setback to the north property line, leaving a depth of 30 feet for the 1 F4 l t