Laserfiche WebLink
PROPRIETARY BUSINESS SCHOOLS <br />AND THE COMMUNITY COLLEGES <br />A study prepared for the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of <br />Health, Education and Welfare under contract HEW OS-71-134. June 10, 1972. Written by Edward <br />W. Erickson, Watts Hill, Jr., Herbert S. Winokur, Jr., Dixie Atwater and Ursula Guerrieri of ICF Inc., <br />Washington, D.C. <br />Proprietary school students complete their programs far more often than do com- <br />munity college students in general in the schools visited. (About 85-90 percent of all <br />proprietary school students at those schools completed their programs, compared to <br />25-35 percent of community college students.)" <br />About 85-90 percent of all proprietary school students enrolled at schools we visited completed some pro- <br />gram. The high completion rates at proprietary schools we visited seem to result generally from two factors: <br />• the schools have a definite vocational mission, and design a curriculum which is within the grasp of <br />students; (It is stressed that admissions counselors must encourage well -motivated, able students, <br />and teachers must provide stimulating presentations, and gear the coursework to individual needs of <br />students.) and, <br />• the intensity and brevity of the programs leave little chance that either elapsed or idle time will affect <br />the student's desire or ability to complete. (Students are in class four or five hours a day, five days a <br />week, for one to eight quarters.) <br />MISSION OF PROPRIETARY SCHOOLS <br />Proprietary schools have a single, well-defined mission — specific occupational training aimed toward full- <br />time job placement in the shortest possible time. This objective meets the needs of students, owners, and ad- <br />ministrators. Preparing students for employment — the students' objective — is consistent with owners' and <br />administrators' profit objective. (The profit motive stimulates continuous changes in program offerings and in- <br />struction methods, to reflect changing student demands and labor market conditions.) Local business and in- <br />dustry also are served by this objective because they are provided with a pool of skilled potential employees <br />whose job training has been geared to meet their particular needs. <br />COMPETITION BETWEEN PROPRIETARY <br />SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITY COLLEGES <br />In contrast to the well-defined goal of proprietary schools, community colleges are characterized by <br />pressures to serve a wide array of area needs and expectations. Generally, community colleges appear to <br />want to offer an "open door" to all who cannot get in or stay in other post -secondary education institutions, and <br />to help students move in the direction of their choice. These conflicting needs and objectives may deter com- <br />munity colleges from developing effective curricula in any one program area — academic, vocational or ' <br />remedial. <br />Our data indicate that many proprietary business school students have above -average high school academic <br />records and can meet the entrance and academic requirements of four-year or community colleges. These <br />proprietary business school students, however, choose to invest substantial sums for courses that are <br />available at much lower direct cost to the student in public institutions. Students in earlier studies have cited <br />three major reasons for the continuing popularity of proprietary vocational schools: <br />TIME, including (1) shorter course length and (2) more frequent starting points (registration) for <br />classes; <br />COURSE CONTENT, in which the curriculum contributes directly to the development of skills <br />necessary for employment; and <br />PLACEMENT SERVICE, under which proprietary vocational schools endeavor to obtain employment <br />for their graduates. <br />I <br />The above paragraphs are key excerpts from "Proprietary Business Schools and <br />Community Colleges: Resource Allocation, Student Needs, and Federal Policies," a <br />research and evaluation report commissioned by the United States Department of <br />Health, Education and Welfare. <br />1 <br />