CC_Minutes_2024_0212 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, February 12, 2024 Page 16 which is in the City Zoning Code. There are specific duties and functions and processes related to the Planning Commission outlined there so he made a reference to that specific Code. Item C stays largely the same with minor changes and he added item D, which is in other Commissions codes Councilmember Etten indicated he would generally support this. Both members of this subcommittee had taken a big circle around the Comprehensive Plan part of the Planning Commission Code, and he wondered what it was doing in there. He thought it got after what the subcommittee was doing. This is what he thought needed to happen to make it fit in the other Commissions' Codes and to clarify where people will find this important information. City Attorney Tierney explained the amendments to Chapter 10 in the Zoning Code will have to go through the Planning Commission but then this amended Chapter 202 should also refer to that section. Mayor Roe indicated Item C makes a reference to that. He noted in Title 10 there is a specific reference to when the Planning Commission and Variance Board meet so that might need to be removed if it is being addressed in Title 2. Councilmember Etten explained there is ongoing discussion between City Staff, himself, and former and current members or other diverse members of the community about the HRIEC. Some common themes are starting to come up and become apparent. There is a lot of frustration from former and some current members about the whole Code and what is going on with the Commission. There is general frustration with big pieces of that and pointing towards some sort of evolution of the current format and purpose and trying to think about this in bigger ways. There is more discussion to have so his thought is to have a bigger discussion at the March Council Worksession. Councilmember Schroeder indicated the environment has changed since the original development of that Commission. She thought the City needed to figure out how to get people wanting to do meaningful work and also have it be useful for the City and Council. Councilmember Strahan asked how the Council would go about offering their own ideas or suggestions along those lines. She wondered if this was something best waited until the Council meets with the HRIEC. She had two things. A couple of years ago, the HRIEC came to the Council and explained they wanted to propose compensating the members. It would set a City precedent to do that, but the City is asking people to do a different level of work and the City is having a harder time with engagement. She understands that Ramsey County and the State of Minnesota do compensate their Commissioners and they have a lot higher level of engagement. She thought it should be on the table to entertain that possibility and consider how it can be a powerful tool.