CC_Minutes_1956_0612 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

.2. Mrs. Stemper of 1955 James, Avenue, in St. Paul, owning property in the vicinity of Co. Rd. "Bn and Western Avenue asked how her property æu1.d be affected by the adoption of these ordinances. Hr. Anderson, Attorney at law, appeared in behalf of Mr. Schwartz, Mr. White, Mr. Willmus, and Mr. Wilson. These people were all i.a opposition to the adoption of the proposed ordinance. Francis Pierson of 2997 Chatsworth stated that his lot will not have the minimum req~d depth if this ordinance'" is adopted. He was toM that hardship cases may be dealt with by the Council. Worth Ochs stated that he is of the opinion that if the ordinances in question be adopted it would be an act of retrogression and not prtgress. Mr. Ochs suggested the ordinances be published for all to read before adoption. Mr. Dan Motel of 1124 Ruggles gave his reasons for be:i.ng in fa".ror of tlle adopt~on of the ordinances in question. J. R. Nelson of 115l Skillman expressed his feelings against the adoption. Mrs. Schwartz asked i'or an eJ..-planation of paved a[lleys mentioned in the proposed ordinance. Ihe was told these alleys will be use. by industrial or cOJll1'l.ercial places of business. William Stenger asked that the ordinances in question be published for the residents of Roseville to read before thq are adopted. Earl Olson of 1993 Aldine stated that his road would be in much be'tar condition if the Village had this ordinance when his street was originaJ.J:y JU" in. Harry Carlson informed Mr. Olson that at the time his street was put in the Village was o~ on the second step of the Road Improvements contained in the existing code. James Kiwan stated that he has assisted in some of the Village plats and that he is in opposition to the adoption of the ordinances. Mr. McGee asked that it be inserted into the records that Mr. Kirwan is interested in the matter .from the real estate standpoint &1so. The Engineer and Attorney pointed out a _í'ew typograpAical errors in the proposed ordinalces and the corrections were made. Jesse B.mcnm of l8.35 N. Lexington caalœd the Council what the reason is for an 85 foot lot frontage requirement mentioned in the proposed ordinance. Mayor Kitts informed Mr. Brown that IJhere are cases now existing in the Village where there isn't enough room provided for the building of garages on 75 foot lots. Hr. BroWD asked that the proposed ordinanceshe published before they are adopted. , Ken Mueller of 22.30 Laurie Rd. asked if 'the ordinances will in any way affect his plat which was accepted about one year ago. He was informed that the adoption of the ord1Bances in question will become effective after its pass- age and publicationø.